Link

Social

Embed

Disable autoplay on embedded content?

Download

Download
Download Transcript


[I.  Call to Order]

[00:00:05]

CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER.

PLEASE CALL THE ROLL.

COUNCILMAN KEEL.

PRESENT.

COUNCILMAN COLE? HERE.

COUNCILMAN COOPER? HERE.

COUNCILMAN MCDANIEL.

PRESENT.

COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY PRESENT.

COUNCILMAN HORN PRESENT MAYOR MAR WOLF.

PRESENT SEVEN.

PRESENT AND ABSENT.

PLEASE STAND AND JOIN IN THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.

PLEDGE OF PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO PLAY OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

AND TWO, THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS, ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL.

[II.  Proclamations and Recognitions]

OKAY, OUR FIRST ITEM OF BUSINESS IS A PROCLAMATION ON NATIONAL NIGHT OUT.

IF I COULD HAVE KATHY WILLIAMS, PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM.

THANK YOU.

GOOD EVENING, MAYOR JULIE MOORE, WOLF CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS AND STAFF.

MY NAME AGAIN IS KATHY WILLIAMS, AND I'M THE PRESIDENT OF KNO COALITION OF NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS.

I'M, I COME BEFORE YOU TO READ THE OFFICIAL PROCLAMATION REGARDING NATIONAL NIGHT OUT OFFICIAL PROCLAMATION, CITY OF DECATUR, ILLINOIS.

WHEREAS THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF TOWN WATCH IN N A T W SPONSORS A NATIONAL COMMUNITY BUILDING CAMPAIGN ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 1ST, 2023 ENTITLED NATIONAL NIGHT OUT.

AND WHEREAS THE NATIONAL NIGHT OUT CAMPAIGN PROVIDES AN OPPORTUNITY FOR NEIGHBORS IN THE, IN YOUR CITY TO JOIN OVER 38 MILLION NEIGHBORS ACROSS 17,000 COMMUNITIES FROM ALL 50 STATES, US TERRITORIES AND MILITARY BASES WORLDWIDE.

AND WHEREAS NATIONAL NIGHT OUT IS AN ANNUAL COMMUNITY BUILDING CAMPAIGN THAT PROMOTES STRONG PLU, STRONG POLICE, COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIPS AND NEIGHBORHOOD CAMARADERIE TO MAKE OUR NEIGHBORHOOD SAFER AND MORE CARING PLACES TO LIVE AND WORK.

AND WHEREAS NEIGHBORS IN DECATUR, ILLINOIS ASSIST THE LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES THROUGH JOINT COMMUNITY BUILDING EFFORTS AND SUPPORT NATIONAL NIGHT OUT 2023 AT HESS PARK FROM FIVE TO 8:00 PM FOR A TIME OF FUN FOOD GAMES AND GIVEAWAYS.

AND WHEREAS IT IS ESSENTIAL THAT ALL NEIGHBORS OF DECATUR, ILLINOIS COME TOGETHER WITH POLICE AND WORK TOGETHER TO BUILD A SAFER, MORE CARING COMMUNITY.

AND NOW, THEREFORE, I MAYOR JULIE MOORE WOLF DO HEREBY CALL UPON ALL NEIGHBORS OF THE CITY OF DECATUR TO JOIN US ALONG WITH THE COALITION OF NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS, THE NATIONAL NIGHT OUT COMMITTEES AND THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF TOWN WATCH IN SUPPORT OF NATIONAL NIGHT OUT ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 1ST, 2023, DONE AT THE CITY HALL, THE 17TH DAY OF JULY, 2023.

AND IF YOU BRING THAT UP, MS. WILLIAMS, I'M HAPPY TO SIGN IT.

IT'S BEEN A WHILE SINCE WE'VE BEEN ABLE TO CELEBRATE.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

LOOK FORWARD TO IT.

[III.  Appearance of Citizens]

AND THE, WE NOW MOVE TO APPEARANCE OF CITIZENS.

THE POLICY RELATIVE TO APPEARANCE OF CITIZENS IS AS FOLLOWS, A 30 MINUTE TIME PERIOD IS PROVIDED FOR CITIZENS TO APPEAR AND EXPRESS THEIR VIEWS BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL.

EACH CITIZEN SPEAKING WILL BE LIMITED TO ONE APPEARANCE OF UP TO THREE MINUTES.

NO IMMEDIATE RESPONSE WILL BE GIVEN BY CITY COUNCIL OR CITY STAFF MEMBERS.

CITIZENS ARE TO GIVE THEIR DOCUMENTS, IF ANY, TO THE POLICE OFFICER FOR DISTRIBUTION TO THE COUNCIL.

AND THE MAYOR DETERMINES THAT ALL PERSONS WISHING TO SPEAK IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS POLICY HAVE DONE SO.

MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND KEY STAFF MAY MAKE COMMENTS IF YOU HAVE SIGNED UP TO SPEAK ON A SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEM.

YOU MAY ALSO SPEAK FOR THREE MINUTES AT THIS TIME.

AND THEN AGAIN, WHEN THE AGENDA ITEM IS CALLED.

WOULD ANYONE WISH TO APPEAR BEFORE COUNSEL AT THIS TIME? IF SO, PLEASE APPROACH THE PODIUM.

GOOD EVENING.

MY NAME IS ALAN JACKSON FROM CASTLE WILLIAMS, POST 1 0 5,

[00:05:01]

THE AMERICAN LEGION.

AND MY NEARLY 30 YEARS IN MILITARY SERVICE.

ONE OF THE THINGS THAT I LEARNED IS TO RECOGNIZE MY OWN FAILURES.

UM, I MUST APOLOGIZE TO COUNCILMAN MCDANIEL.

UM, LAST MEETING, UH, YOU WERE TRYING TO MAKE SOME COMMENTS AND THERE WAS A GENTLEMAN HECKLING YOU FROM THE AUDIENCE HERE.

THAT WAS ME.

I APOLOGIZE.

YOU WERE CORRECT IN STATING THAT, UM, SPRINGFIELD IS NUMBER ONE AND DECATUR IS NUMBER TWO IN THE NUMBER OF VIDEO GAMING MACHINES.

UM, SO I APOLOGIZE FOR INTERRUPTING YOUR REMARKS AND I HOPE YOU ACCEPT THAT.

UM, I DO HAVE A COUPLE OF COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROPOSED CHANGES TO CHAPTER 52.

UM, WHY DOES ANY FUTURE CLASS C LICENSE HOLDER, UH, LIQUOR LICENSE HOLDER HAVE TO BE IN BUSINESS FOR AT LEAST FIVE YEARS BEFORE THEY CAN APPLY FOR A LICENSE? THAT SEEMS TO ME THAT THERE ARE, UH, NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS OUT THERE THAT MAY WANT TO ESTABLISH THEMSELVES HERE IN DECATUR, BUT YET THEY HAVE TO WAIT FIVE YEARS TO APPLY FOR A LIQUOR LICENSE THAT'S CREATING AN UNDUE BURDEN ON THEM.

UM, AND I WOULD LIKE AN ANSWER TO THAT PARTICULAR QUESTION.

UH, LAST MEETING, YOU ALSO DECIDED TO POSTPONE ANY DECISION ON THAT AND YOU WANTED MORE TIME TO, UH, MAKE A DECISION.

I THROW BACK TO YOU, HAVE YOU EVER CONSIDERED ASKING THOSE OF US THAT THIS MAY AFFECT TO COME TOGETHER AND BE SHAREHOLDERS IN THE DECISION THAT THIS IS THAT IS BEING MADE? WHY NOT GET DIRECT INPUT INSTEAD OF JUST BEING HERE AT THIS MEETING AND ONLY ALLOWING FOR THREE MINUTES? WHY NOT INVITE SOME OF THE SHAREHOLDERS TO COME TOGETHER TO GO THROUGH THAT PARTICULAR, UM, CHAPTER ORDINANCE, WHATEVER YOU WANNA CALL IT THERE, AND GO THROUGH IT POINT BY POINT AND FIND OUT WHERE THE TWO PARTIES MIGHT COME TO AN AGREEMENT ON.

I THINK YOU MIGHT FIND IT BETTER RECEIVED FROM US IF YOU DO ALLOW US THAT OPPORTUNITY.

THANK YOU.

THANK YOU, MR. JACKSON.

DOES ANYONE ELSE WISH TO APPEAR? GOOD EVENING.

UM, MY NAME IS EVELYN HOOD.

UM, I LIVE AT, UM, 1105 EAST WHITMER STREET IN DECATUR, ILLINOIS.

AND I WILL LIKE TO, UM, I HAVE A COMPLAINT AND MY COMPLAINT IS ABOUT EXCESSIVE FIREWORKS.

UM, ON JULY TUESDAY, JULY EVE, UH, THE FOURTH ON THE EVENING, I LIVED THERE AT THE CORNER OF 1105 EAST WHITMER AND SOUTH ILLINOIS STREET.

UH, AROUND NINE O'CLOCK THAT NIGHT, UH, WE STARTED HEARING FIREWORKS AND MY NEIGHBOR NEXT DOOR, I SAID, WELL, WHAT'S GOING ON? AND THEY WERE VERY LOUD.

THEY WERE VIBRATING MY HOUSE.

I MEAN, WE WERE JUST HAVING ALL KINDS OF NOISE THERE.

AND, UM, I DIDN'T KNOW THAT THEY HAD GOT A BLOCK PARTY PERMIT.

I DON'T KNOW IF THE PERMIT ALLOWED THEM TO SHOOT ALL THESE FI FIREWORKS OR NOT.

THEY WERE IN THE STREETS.

UH, I DO HAVE PICTURES.

I DON'T, I DIDN'T GIVE IT TO ANYONE.

I DON'T KNOW WHO WAS SUPPOSED TO HAVE THESE PICTURES, BUT I DID TAKE PICTURES.

I HAD TALKED TO COUNCILMAN, UM, MCDANIEL ABOUT THE PROBLEM.

SO, UM, MY NEIGHBOR AND I WERE DISCUSSING BECAUSE WE DID NOT SIGN, UH, THE PETITION THAT, THAT THE MAN HAD THAT I FOUND OUT THAT LIVED DOWN BELOW ME.

BUT LAST YEAR I HAD A PROBLEM WITH THE FIREWORKS.

UH, THEY BURNED MY TREE UP.

OKAY.

AND THEN THE YEAR BE PROBABLY BEFORE THERE WAS A SHOOTING RIGHT DOWN THERE AND THE VICTIM CAME THROUGH MY YARD.

WE DO HAVE A CAMERA STANDING UP THERE.

I DON'T KNOW WHAT IT'S THERE FOR, BUT IT SEEMS LIKE WE CAN'T GET ANY HELP IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD WITH SOME OF THESE PROBLEMS THAT WE'RE HAVING WITH OUR NEIGHBORS.

SO I HOPE THAT THE COUNCIL CAN HELP ME OUT TONIGHT.

AND I KNOW THAT WE'RE GONNA HAVE FIREWORKS, BUT I DON'T THINK WE SHOULD HAVE BUMS AND I DON'T THINK THEY SHOULD BE VIBRATING MY HOUSE.

UM, IF SO, LET ME LIVE IN YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD UNTIL THE FIREWORKS OVER.

BUT ANYWAY, THAT CONTINUED ABOUT, OH, MAYBE TWO OR THREE HOURS.

AND THEN THEY HAD A STREET FIRE FROM THE FIREWORKS.

AND I DIDN'T KNOW IT WAS ALL THAT WAS PERMISSIBLE DURING THE, UM, JUNETEENTH, I MEAN, NOT THE JUNETEENTH, EXCUSE ME, THE 4TH OF JULY.

I KNOW YOU'RE

[00:10:01]

GONNA HAVE FIREWORKS, BUT I DIDN'T KNOW YOU WENT TO THAT FAR WITH THEM.

SO, UM, I JUST NEED YOU TO HELP ME OUT WITH THAT PROBLEM IN OUR COMMUNITY.

WE LIVE IN JOHNS HILL COMMUNITY.

WE ARE TRYING TO KEEP IT BEAUTIFUL AND THE NEIGHBORS ARE CONCERNED ABOUT THE PROBLEM THAT WE ARE HAVING THERE.

MM-HMM.

.

SO I THANK YOU FOR LISTENING AND IF YOU WANNA LOOK AT SOME OF THESE PHOTOS THAT I BROUGHT, YOU'RE WELCOME TO DO SO.

UM, WE WERE PRETTY, PRETTY, UH, SURPRISED ABOUT ALL THE THINGS WERE HAPPENING THERE, BUT WE ARE HAVING SOME PROBLEMS THERE IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD.

SO WE HOPE THAT YOU WOULD HELP US OUT A LITTLE BIT THAT THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME.

AND MAY GOD BLESS YOU.

THANK YOU, MS. HUD.

DOES ANYONE ELSE WISH TO APPEAR BEFORE COUNSEL? NO.

HELLO, MY NAME IS ABI MOAN AND I'M HERE TO REPORT A COMPLAINT.

BEFORE I START, I WANTED TO REMIND YOU OF JANUARY 6TH WHEN THEY HARMED ME IN THE BUS.

THE SAME TIME THEY ATTACKED THE CAPITOL AROUND THAT TIME IN FRONT OF THE HOLY LUTHERAN CHURCH.

HOLY LUTHERAN CROSS CHURCH, UM, AROUND THE CORNER OF MOUND ROAD AND WATER STREET.

THERE, THERE'S A RESTAURANT ACROSS, AND THERE WERE TERRORISTS SUPPORTERS IN THAT RESTAURANT.

BUT BETWEEN THE CHURCH AND THE RESTAURANT ACROSS OF IT, THEY HAD A PERSON TAKE A BRICK, A WHOLE BRICK, THROW IT AT THE BUS.

AND IT HAD TO DO WITH MEMBERS OF THAT CHURCH ALSO WITH THE TERRORISTS IN THAT RESTAURANT.

I JUST FOUND THAT OUT JUST RECENTLY.

AND I WANTED TO LET YOU KNOW THAT THAT BUS DRIVER WHO DID HARM ME ON JANUARY 6TH IS RELATED TO TIM MACKIN AND TIM MACKINS RELATED TO MERCY HOSPITAL OF ST.

LOUIS, NAMED STEVEN MACKIN.

AND THEY'RE RELATED TO MIDWEST PETROLEUM, JAMES MCNUTT AND THEIR RELATED TO MY FORMER EMPLOYER, BOB SASSER WITH DOLLAR TREE AND DEAL STORES.

THEY COORDINATED EFFORTS TO HARM ME FROM JULY, FROM JUNE 13TH THROUGH THE 26TH.

AND THEY ALSO WORKED WITH PEOPLE IN THE MACON COUNTY HEALTH CENTER, SOME EMPLOYEES THERE.

THEY, THEY HELD ME AGAINST MY WILL, LIKE A PRISONER OF WAR TRYING TO DEFAME ME, TORTURE ME, TRY TO KILL ME SEVERAL TIMES.

AND THERE WERE WITNESSES, ALL RETALIATION.

WHY? BECAUSE OF POLITICS, POLITICAL AND NATIONAL PO CORRUPTION PLUS ALSO FOR TERRORISTS, ALSO RELAYED TO THESE PEOPLE'S ATTORNEY, JAMES HACKING.

AND JAMES HACKING IS TRYING TO SACRIFICE WOMEN AND KILL WOMEN SO HE CAN WORK THE TERRORISTS.

THAT'S NOT FAIR AND THAT'S NOT RIGHT.

AND I'M MAKING THIS COMPLAINT TO YOU BECAUSE I AM NOT WEAK AND I AM NOT AFRAID.

BUT I DO WANT YOU ALL, I'M THE COMMUNITY AND WE'RE ALL HERE.

WE'RE THE COMMUNITY.

EVERYBODY HAS A RIGHT TO LIFE.

I SHOULDN'T HAVE TO DIE BECAUSE OF POLITICS.

I SHOULDN'T HAVE TO STRUGGLE BECAUSE OF POLITICS.

WE'RE HERE, WE'RE ALL COMMUNITY, WE'RE ALL FAMILY.

WE NEED TO, TO LOVE ONE ANOTHER, NOT KILL ONE ANOTHER.

WHEN IS THIS KILLING AND THIS FIGHTING AND THIS CHALLENGING? WHEN IS IT GONNA STOP? I WOULD LIKE EVERYONE, I MEAN, THE LAST MEETING HERE, I WASN'T EVEN ABLE TO ATTEND IT BECAUSE I WAS TORTURED.

AND IT'S ALL BECAUSE THEY WANNA DEFAY MY NAME, DEFAY MY NAME.

WHEN IS THIS GONNA STOP? I'M HERE FOR THE COMMUNITY.

WE'RE STILL FAMILY.

WE'RE SUPPOSED TO BE WORKING AS ONE.

I JUST HOPE THAT YOU GUYS CAN CHANGE YOUR MINDS AND, YOU KNOW, HELP TO STOP THE CORRUPTION AND ESPECIALLY THE NEPOTISM IN THE SYSTEM.

THANK YOU.

THANK YOU MA'AM.

YOU'RE WELCOME.

DOES ANYONE ELSE WISH TO APPEAR BEFORE COUNCIL? GOOD EVENING MAYOR.

MORE WOLF COUNCIL MEMBERS.

MY NAME IS AUSTIN UZI.

I'M A 30 YEAR OLD MOTHER OF TWO KIDS IN THIS, UH, COMMUNITY.

I'M AN INVESTED MEMBER OF THIS COMMUNITY.

I WASN'T QUITE EXACTLY PLANNING ON THIS, SO PLEASE EXCUSE ME.

UH, THIS IS IN REGARDS TO THE VIDEO GAMING IN THE CITY OF DECATUR.

UM, I UNDERSTAND IT IS A HARD TUSSLE WITHIN THE CITY.

UH, YOU HAVE PARLORS THAT ARE NOT REGULATED THAT LOOK LIKE THEY SHOULDN'T BE THERE.

I UNDERSTAND THAT.

UM, MY CONCERN IS, AS A MOTHER OF TWO IN THIS COMMUNITY RAISING TWO LITTLE KIDS IN THIS COMMUNITY IS HOW IT'S GONNA AFFECT MY CHILDREN DOWN THE ROAD.

I UNDERSTAND THAT THERE IS CONCERNS WITH THE GAMING GAMBLING PARLORS WITHIN PEOPLE WHO HAVE ADDICTIONS WITHIN THAT.

THERE ARE ALL ALSO PEOPLE THAT HAVE ADDICTIONS TO ALCOHOL THAT CONTINUE TO GO TO PAR TO BARS.

SORRY, I'M NERVOUS.

I WASN'T EXPECTING THIS.

UM, MY CONCERN IS, IS THAT IF WE DON'T REGULATE IT IN SOME WAY, BUT WE CAN STILL ISSUE LICENSES FOR GAMBLING PARLORS, THERE ARE STILL WAYS TO REGULATE IT.

IF YOU LOOK AT OTHER COMMUNITIES SUCH AS TAYLORVILLE, MONTGOMERY, OSWEGO, PLACES UP NORTH THAT

[00:15:01]

REGULATE THE MACHINES, REGULATE HOW IT'S PORTRAYED WITHOUT IN THE CITY.

SOME MUNICIPALITIES ALLOW IT TO BE 24 TO 36 SIGNS OUTSIDE OF THE PARLORS THAT SHOW THAT THERE IS VIDEO GAMING INSIDE.

SO I UNDERSTAND THAT SOME COUNCIL MEMBERS HAVE CONCERN OF HOW IT LOOKS UPON OUR CITY.

THERE ARE WAYS TO REGULATE THAT.

MY CONCERN IS IF WE DO NOT FIGURE OUT A WAY TO HAVE PARTNERSHIPS WITH VIDEO GAMING PARLORS OR BARS OR RESTAURANTS OR BREAKFAST PLACES, THAT WE DO NOT COME TO THE HAPPY MEDIUM TO WHERE OUR COMMUNITY IS TAXED.

THAT DOESN'T AFFECT ME RIGHT NOW.

MY CONCERN IS, IS IF MY KIDS DO NOT, IF MY KIDS CHOOSE TO LIVE WITHIN THIS CITY OF DECATUR LIMITS, THEY'RE GONNA BE AFFECTED BY THAT LONG TERM.

I'M NOT GONNA BEAT A DEAD HORSE.

YOU GUYS HAVE YOUR OPINIONS.

I HAVE MINE.

THAT IS OKAY.

I'M, I'M TOTALLY FINE WITH THAT.

I'M JUST COMING HERE AS A MOTHER OF TWO LITTLE KIDS AND HOW THAT'S GONNA AFFECT THEM LONG TERM AND THE PRICE THEY'RE GONNA PAY IF WE CANNOT FIGURE OUT HOW TO HAVE THAT HAPPY MEDIUM.

I PERSONALLY, I'VE SEEN PARLORS TO WHERE I'M JUST LIKE, WHY IS THAT THERE? I GET THAT.

I UNDERSTAND THE CONCERN, BUT I KNOW THERE'S A WAY TO COME TO A HAPPY MEDIUM TO WHERE WE CAN WORK WITH SMALL BUSINESS OWNERS WITHIN THE AREA AND FIGURE THAT OUT.

UM, IF YOU GUYS HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS, YOU GUYS ARE MORE THAN WELCOME TO EMAIL ME AT ANY TIME AND CONTACT ME.

UM, BUT YEAH, THAT'S, THERE'S MIA'S MOM, SO, BUT YEAH.

THANK YOU.

THANK YOU MA'AM.

I BELIEVE THERE'S A GENTLEMAN.

YEAH, COME ON DOWN.

HELLO, MY NAME IS, UH, DWAYNE JONES.

UH, AND I'M JUST KIND OF ECHOING WHAT MRS. HOOD WAS SAYING.

I STAY IN THAT SAME NEIGHBORHOOD AND, UM, I WAS JUST TRYING TO SEE WHAT COULD BE DONE ABOUT THESE FIREWORKS.

UM, AS SHE STATED, THEY STARTED AT NINE, THEY PROBABLY STOPPED PROBABLY ONE 30 IN THE MORNING.

UH, UM, SAME FIREWORKS THAT YOU SEE DOWN AT THE LAKE.

THESE ARE FIREWORK, THE SAME TYPE OF FIREWORKS THAT ARE LIT IN NEIGHBORHOODS.

UH, MY WATCHED, UH, FIREWORKS BEING SHOT OVER THE ROOFS OF PEOPLE'S HOUSES, YOU KNOW, THEY'RE BEING RECKLESS ABOUT IT.

UM, AND AS SHE SAID, THE, UH, A FIRE, UH, WELL ACTUALLY THERE WERE TWO FIRES THAT WEREN'T IN THE STREET.

UH, THE FIRE DEPARTMENT CAME AND, AND PUT OUT ONE.

UM, BUT I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE PROCESS IS FOR THESE PEOPLE TO GET THESE FIREWORKS OR IS THERE A LIMIT ON WHAT TIME THEY CAN, THEY COULD FIRE 'EM OFF.

UM, I JUST, I KNOW IT'S, UH, IT'S TOO BIG OF AN ISSUE FOR THE, FOR THE CITY, THE POLICE DEPARTMENT.

UM, CAUSE THEY'LL, YOU KNOW, YOU GOT FIREWORKS GOING ALL OVER THE CITY AND THEN YOU HAVE SOME PEOPLE REPORTING GUNSHOTS.

CAUSE SOME PEOPLE DON'T KNOW THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A GUNSHOT AND THE FIREWORKS.

AND, UH, SO JUST SAYING WHAT COULD BE DONE, UH, TO TRY AND DETER, I KNOW IN, UH, I WAS SPEAKING TO ONE OF MY FRIENDS OF MINE, FRIENDS OF MINE THAT STAYS, UH, IN THE SOUTH SUBURB OF CHICAGO.

AND HE SAID THAT, UH, SINCE THEY IMPOSED THE, UH, I THINK HE, I BELIEVE IT WAS A $1,500 FINE FOR SHOOTING ALL FIREWORKS.

UH, UH, IT DETERRED A LOT OF IT.

YOU STILL GOING TO HAVE SOME, BUT I THINK THAT WOULD GET SOME PEOPLE'S ATTENTION.

ALRIGHT, THANK YOU.

THANK YOU MR. JONES.

IS THERE ANYONE ELSE WHO'D LIKE TO COME? SURE.

COME ON DOWN, MA'AM.

HELLO? HI, MY NAME IS MONICA CRUZ.

I LIVE IN THE SAME NEIGHBORHOOD AS, UM, MR. DWAYNE AND MS. UM, HOOD.

UM, YEAH, IT WAS HORRIBLE.

UM, IT KNOCKED THE FIREWORKS, KNOCKED THE CLOCK OFF MY WALL, AND MY CHILD CANNOT SLEEP.

HE'S TWO YEARS OLD AND I COULD HAVE SWEAR THEY ALMOST CAUGHT MY HOUSE ON FIRE.

I WAS LOOKING AT MY SECURITY CAMERA AND IT WAS SMOKE AND YEAH, IT WAS JUST HORRIBLE.

I JUST WANTED TO ADD THAT.

I DON'T KNOW WHERE THEY'RE GETTING THESE, THEY SOUNDED LIKE BOMBS JUST REPEATEDLY, SO I JUST WANTED TO SHARE THAT.

THANK YOU.

THANK YOU, MS. CRUZ.

IS THERE ANYONE ELSE WHO WOULD LIKE TO COME BEFORE COUNSEL AT THIS TIME? SEEING NONE, I WANNA OPEN IT UP TO COUNSEL.

MR. HL.

SO ON 4TH OF JULY, UH, WE USUALLY JUST GO DOWN BECAUSE IT'S EASY TO THIS LITTLE BRIDGE OVER SOUTH

[00:20:01]

SHORES.

AND, UH, THERE'S A LITTLE AREA YOU CAN PARK CARS AND A LOT OF PEOPLE JUST GO DOWN THERE TO WATCH FIREWORKS.

SO WE'RE WATCHING THE, THE CITY FIREWORKS AND IT'S PRETTY, IT'S PRETTY PANORAMIC.

YOU CAN SEE FIREWORKS ALL OVER TOWN.

BUT THERE WAS THIS ONE AREA TO THE LEFT OF THE CITY FIREWORKS THAT FRANKLY WAS PUTTING THE CITY FIREWORKS TO SHAME.

I MEAN, THIS, THIS WAS ROCKING AND I DON'T, AND I SAID, THAT LOOKS LIKE IT'S OVER BY JOHNS HILL OR SOMETHING.

AND SOMEBODY ELSE SAYS, NO, THAT'S WARRENSBURG.

I SAID, I DON'T THINK YOU CAN SEE WARRENSBURG FIREWORKS FROM HERE.

I SAID, I SAID, I THINK THAT'S OVER BY JOHNS HILL.

SO IF THIS IS WHAT THESE FOLKS ARE TALKING ABOUT, I CAN'T BLAME HIM BECAUSE IT WAS A LOT GOING ON.

I DON'T KNOW ALL OUR RULES.

OKAY.

AND I KNOW THAT ONE OF THE ARGUMENTS IS OUR POLICE OFFICERS HAVE SO MUCH GOING ON AND THERE'S SO MANY PEOPLE SHOOTING FIREWORKS OFF.

I GUESS WHAT I'M SAYING IS MAYBE WE NEED TO HAVE SOME KIND OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR NEXT YEAR TO SOMEHOW REGULATE THIS.

AND I, I DON'T KNOW WHAT THAT IS, BUT I THINK IT'S WORTH TALKING ABOUT.

WE MIGHT HAVE TO LOOK AT SOME SORT OF VERY, YOU KNOW, EXTENSIVE FINE BECAUSE IT, IT IS A PROBLEM EACH AND EVERY YEAR.

UM, I'M ASSUMING THAT THESE FIREWORKS WERE PROBABLY NOT ISSUED A PERMIT TO DO IT.

UM, MOST, I I DON'T THINK WE HAD MORE THAN THREE OR FOUR PERMITS THAT WERE ISSUED FOR FIREWORKS.

WERE ALSO IN A DROUGHT.

SO SHOOTING THEM OFF ANYWHERE WAS A BAD IDEA.

SOME COMMUNITIES EVEN, UM, HAD A PROBLEM AND, AND CANCELED THEIR FIREWORKS.

UM, AS FAR AS WHAT TO DO, IT, IT IS A PROBLEM FOR POLICE BECAUSE, AND ANECDOTALLY I DON'T HAVE DATA ON THIS, JUST IN CONVERSATIONS WITH, UH, POLICE OFFICERS OVER THE YEARS, YOU KNOW, NEIGHBORS CALL THE POLICE DEPARTMENT AND COMPLAIN BY THE TIME POLICE ARE ABLE TO GET THERE, BECAUSE THEY'RE ALSO DEALING WITH, UM, PEOPLE WHO ARE REALLY OVER CELEBRATING AND, UH, TRYING TO KEEP THE PEACE.

ON THE 4TH OF JULY, QUITE OFTEN WHEN POLICE OFFICERS WOULD GET TO A FIREWORKS DISPLAY, THE DISPLAY IS OVER AND THEN THE NEIGHBORS DON'T WANNA FILE A COMPLAINT CUZ NEIGHBORS JUST REALLY WANT THE FIREWORKS TO STOP.

BUT, YOU KNOW, IT'S DANGEROUS.

THEY SHOULDN'T BE DOING IT.

WE NEED TO COME UP WITH SOME ALTERNATIVE OR SOME GO TO THE LAKE, WATCH THEM DOWN THERE.

IT'S, IT'S, UM, BETTER FOR ALL OF US.

PAT, UH, TURN YOUR MIC ON, PLEASE.

I AGREE.

I MEAN, I, I THINK THIS YEAR I'VE HEARD IT WAS LIKE BOMBS AND MR. JOHNSON AS A VIETNAM VETERAN, I SIT UP IN BED THINKING, IS THAT GUNS OR IS THAT FIREWORKS? SO THAT BOTHERS ME IN THAT.

AND, UH, UM, MRS. UH, HOOD AND I HAVE TALKED SEVERAL TIMES, AND YOU KNOW, WHEN YOU HAVE TO HAVE THE FIRE DEPARTMENT COME OUT TO PUT OUT FIRE ON THE ASPHALT ROAD IN THAT, AND IT IS HARD TO, NOW I KNOW FIREWORKS ARE, UH, CANNOT BE SOLD IN ILLINOIS.

ARE FIREWORKS ILLEGAL? TECHNICALLY, YES.

OKAY.

SO, AND THERE WERE ONLY FOUR PERMITS THIS YEAR THAT WERE ISSUED BY THE, UH, FIRE DEPARTMENT FOR FIREWORKS.

SO, BUT IT IS, IT'S BE IT'S, IT'S ALWAYS BEEN A PROBLEM.

BUT NOW THEY ARE, I AGREE WITH THEY'RE USING LARGER, BUYING, LARGER, UH, FIREWORKS.

OTHER COMMENTS, MR. COOPER? UM, I TOO AGREE WITH THE COM ALL THE COMMENTS THAT'S BEEN SAID SO FAR, AND HOPEFULLY MAYBE WE CAN LOOK AT SOMETHING AND SEE WHAT WE CAN DO BEFORE THIS TIME NEXT YEAR.

BUT JUST FOR THOSE IN THE JOHN SEALS AREA, IT WAS NOT JUST JOHNS SEALS AREA.

UH, I LIVE OUT NORTH AND MINE WENT TO 4:00 AM IN THE MORNING AND THEY WERE JUST AS BAD.

SO HOPEFULLY WE CAN, UM, AS A COUNCIL IN THE CITY, WE CAN LOOK AT SOMETHING AND DO WHAT WE NEED TO DO TO TRY TO AT LEAST REDUCE IT.

I THINK IT IS SOMETHING THAT, UH, YOU, YOU'RE NOT GONNA BE ABLE TO POLICE IT AND SOLVE IT BECAUSE IT'S ALL OVER TOWN.

UM, AND THAT'S, THAT'S NOT GONNA BE REALISTICALLY POSSIBLE, BUT MAYBE YOU CAN IDENTIFY THOSE THAT ARE THE BIGGEST, BIGGEST ONES AND GET THEM TO BE ELIMINATED WITH FINES.

AND MAYBE WE ALSO CAN LOOK AT NOT AUTHORIZING, UM, ANY BLOCK PARTIES ON THAT PARTICULAR DAY OR WEEKEND.

WELL, GOOD DO KIND OF HATE TO TAKE AWAY A BLOCK PARTY FOR NEIGHBORHOODS THAT WANNA CELEBRATE THE RIGHT WAY.

BUT YEAH, THOSE WERE, THOSE WERE NOT LEGAL FIREWORKS.

MS. GREGORY, IN THIS INSTANCE, WE DO HAVE, UM, PERMISSION FOR A BLOCK PARTY.

SO I WOULD ASSUME THAT WE HAVE A NAMES ATTACHED TO THAT PETITION.

UM, WE ALSO NOW HAVE PICTURES, UM, THAT ARE PRETTY CLEAR.

I'M SURE THAT IF THE CHIEF WERE TO LOOK AT THEM, HE MIGHT BE ABLE TO TELL WHAT WAS LEGAL AND WHAT WASN'T.

UM, BUT I DO THINK THAT IT IS CERTAINLY WORTH A FOLLOW UP CALL, UM, SIMPLY TO SAY, UM, YOU WERE OUT OF LINE, UM, AND THIS IS THE TYPE OF ACTIVITY THAT WE'RE NOT GONNA TOLERATE.

AND IF THERE ARE FINES THAT CAN BE ASSESSED AFTER THE FACT, GIVEN THAT YOU HAVE WHAT YOU NEED TO SUBSTANTIATE THAT, I WOULD SUGGEST THAT CITY STAFF LOOK INTO THAT.

ANY OTHER COMMENTS FROM COUNCIL? LET MR. CULP JUST ONE ADDITION TO THAT,

[00:25:01]

A LOT OF THESE FIRES ARE PURCHASED OUTTA STATE AND IT'S, UH, COMMONPLACE, UNFORTUNATELY, BUT POSSESSION OF IT, LIKE, UH, MR. UH, WRIGHT MENTIONED IT IS AGAINST ORDINANCE.

IT SEEMS LIKE FROM JUNE TO SEPTEMBER.

WE HAVE NIGHTS OF THIS OR WEEKENDS OF THIS AND, AND WE HAD SAME IN MY NEIGHBORHOOD.

IT'S VERY UNFORTUNATE.

UH, BUT YEAH, A GOOD FOLLOW UP CALL MAY NOT HURT WITH ESPECIALLY NAMES AND PICTURES AND SO FORTH.

ON A SEPARATE NOTE, UM, I MAY BE DEPARTING THE COUNCIL MEETING EARLY TONIGHT FOR A FAMILY VISITATION.

THAT'S ALL I HAVE.

THANK YOU.

ANY OTHER COMMENTS, MR. HORN? SORRY.

WELL, I, I CONCUR WITH MY COLLEAGUES AND, UM, UH, COUNCILMAN HLS CALL FOR SOME SORT OF EVALUATION OF WHAT PERHAPS BEST PRACTICES THAT OTHER CITIES ARE DOING IN REGARDS TO REDUCING THE AMOUNT OF, OF FIRES TAKING PLACE.

I HAPPEN TO BE IN A RIDE ALONG WITH THE POLICE DEPARTMENT ON JULY 4TH, A COUPLE YEARS AGO, AND IT SEEMED LIKE EVERY BLOCK, UH, IN THE CITY HAD SOMEONE SHOOTING OFF FIREWORKS.

AND, UM, I I, I KNOW PERSONALLY OF INDIVIDUALS WHO HAVE HAD THEIR PERSONAL PROPERTY BURNED DOWN AS A RESULT OF FIREWORKS.

AND SO WE THINK OF THESE AS KIND OF JUST FARM WORK.

FIREWORKS TO SE CELEBRATE INDEPENDENCE DAY, BUT SIGNIFICANT LOSS OF PROPERTY HAS TAKEN PLACE.

THANK YOU.

OKAY, MOVING ON TO

[IV.  Approval of Minutes]

APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES.

APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF JUNE 20TH, 2023.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING.

I NEED A MOTION AND A SECOND.

SO MOVED.

SECOND.

COUNCILMAN KEEL.

ALL RIGHT.

COUNCILMAN COLE.

AYE.

COUNCILMAN COOPER? AYE.

COUNCILMAN MCDANIEL? AYE.

COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY AYE.

COUNCILMAN HORN? AYE.

MAYOR MOORE WOLF.

AYE.

SEVEN AYES, NO NAYS, ANY UNFINISHED BUSINESS TONIGHT? NONE.

MOVING TO NEW BUSINESS ITEM

[1.  Treasurer's Financial Report]

ONE, TREASURER'S FINANCIAL REPORT.

MR. WRIGHTON, MAYOR AND COUNCIL, THE FINANCIAL POSITION, UH, THAT THE REPORT THAT YOU HAVE IN YOUR PACKET, UM, MIRRORS REALLY, I THINK THE COMMUNITY'S OVERALL FINANCIAL CONDITION IN GENERAL.

AND I WOULD SUMMARIZE IT BY SAYING THAT IT'S OKAY, BUT IT'S PLATEAUING.

UM, SOME OF THE KEY REVENUES ARE PLATEAUING.

THEY ARE NOT TANKING.

THAT'S, THAT'S THE GOOD NEWS.

AND I BELIEVE THAT IT, UH, IS COMPATIBLE WITH OUR GENERAL STRATEGY OF, UH, MAINTAINING REASONABLE RESERVES WHILE ALSO BEING CONSERVATIVE IN OUR SPENDING AND ADOPTION OF NEW PROGRAMS. I, THAT'S HOW WE CONTINUE.

WE'LL, WE'LL CONTINUE ABSENT A DIFFERENT DIRECTION FROM YOU BOTH, UH, UH, INTO THE BALANCE OF THE YEAR, AS WELL AS IN THE PREPARATION OF THE, UM, OF THE 2024 BUDGET.

AND I THINK THIS, UH, REPORT IS ON TRACK WITH THAT.

IF THERE'S ANY QUESTIONS OF THE, THE TREASURER'S NOT HERE, BUT, UH, BUT ANTHONY WHO HELPED PREPARE THIS REPORT IS IF YOU HAVE SOME SPECIFIC QUESTIONS.

ANY QUESTIONS FROM COUNSEL? SCENE? NONE.

WE DON'T NEED TO APPROVE IT, SO THAT'S OKAY.

WE'LL MOVE ON TO THE NEXT ITEM.

ITEM

[2.  Ordinance Annexing Territory 4469 Commercial Crossing]

TWO, ORDINANCE ANNEXING TERRITORY AT 40, TERRITORY AT 44 69.

COMMERCIAL CROSSING MOTION THAT THE ORDINANCE DO PASS AND BE ADOPTED.

SO MOVED.

SECOND, MR. WRIGHT MAYOR AND COUNSEL.

THIS ITEM FOR AN ANNEXATION AT 44 69.

COMMERCIAL CROSSING IS A COMPANION WITH THE ITEM THAT FOLLOWS AT ITEM THREE.

UM, YOU SHOULD CONSIDER THEM AS, AS TWO PARTS OF THE SAME ITEM.

THE, UH, OWNER OF THE PROPERTY, UH, PROPOSES TO DEVELOP IT FOR COMMERCIAL PURPOSES.

UM, THE REASON WHY THIS ANNEXATION IS NOT ON YOUR CONSENT AGENDA IS BECAUSE IT'S NOT A ROUTINE ANNEXATION, UH, IN PART BECAUSE IT'S LINKED WITH THE REZONING THAT COMES UNANIMOUSLY TO YOU FROM THE PLAN COMMISSION.

BUT ALSO BECAUSE IN THIS PARTICULAR CASE, THE CITY, UM, OFFERED SOME WATER AND SEWER ASSISTANCE BECAUSE THE PROPERTY DOESN'T ACTUALLY HAVE IT DIRECTLY.

IT'S, IT'S NOT THAT FAR AWAY.

UH, BUT IT'S NOT ACTUALLY AT THE PROPERTY LINE.

IN EXCHANGE, BOTH FOR ANNEXATION AND FOR THE PROPERTY OWNER PROVIDING SOME ADDITIONAL RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE PLANNED EAST BYPASS, WE HAVE BEEN WORKING WITH THE COUNTY TO TRY TO PIECE TOGETHER SOME OF THESE PARCELS, UH, SO THAT THE BYPASS CAN, UH, MOVE TO THE NEXT STAGE OF LAND ACQUISITION AND FINAL DESIGN.

UM, SO BECAUSE THAT'S A FAIRLY UNIQUE FEATURE OF WHAT WOULD OTHERWISE BE, A FAIRLY ROUTINE REZONING AS WELL AS A ROUTINE ANNEXATION, I PUT IT ON, UH, ON THE REGULAR AGENDA.

ANY QUESTIONS FOR MR. WRIGHTON FROM COUNCIL? SCENE? NONE.

COUNCILMAN HL AYE.

COUNCILMAN COLE? AYE.

COUNCILMAN COOPER? AYE.

COUNCILMAN MCDANIEL? AYE.

COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY AYE.

COUNCILMAN HORN? AYE.

MAYOR MOORE WOLF.

AYE.

SEVEN AYES NO NAYS.

ITEM THREE, ORDINANCE

[3.  Ordinance Rezoning Property from R-1 Single Family Residence District to M-1 Intense Commercial/Light Industrial District – 4469 N Commercial Crossing]

REZONING PROPERTY FROM R ONE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT TO M ONE INTENSE COMMERCIAL LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT 44 69 NORTH COMMERCIAL CROSSING MOTION IS THE ORDINANCE TO PASS AND BE ADOPTED IN.

SO MOVED.

SECOND.

MR. RIGHTON, I HAVE NOTHING TO ADD.

ANY QUESTIONS? SCENE NONE.

COUNCILMAN KEEL? AYE.

COUNCILMAN COLT? AYE.

COUNCILMAN COOPER? AYE.

COUNCILMAN MCDANIEL? AYE.

COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY AYE.

COUNCILMAN HORN? AYE.

MAYOR MOORE WOLF.

AYE.

SEVEN AYES NO NAYS.

ITEM FOUR, RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING

[4.  Resolution Authorizing Contract for Pay and Benefits for I.A.F.F. Local 505 Fire Association]

CONTRACT FOR PAY AND BENEFITS FOR I A A F I A F F, LOCAL

[00:30:01]

5 0 5 FIRE ASSOCIATION MOTIONS, THE RESOLUTION TO PASS AND BE ADOPTED.

SO MOVED.

SECOND, MR. WRIGHT, MAYOR AND COUNCIL IS MY REQUEST THAT YOU APPROVE THE, UM, RESOLUTION, UH, AUTHORIZING THE ME TO EXECUTE THE COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENT FOR THE FIRE UNION.

I'M NOT GONNA GO THROUGH ALL THE DETAILS OF IT, IT'S 60 PAGES LONG.

UM, AND YOU'RE ALREADY FAMILIAR WITH A LOT OF THE KEY ELEMENTS AND I PROVIDED A HIGHLIGHTS, UH, UH, SUMMARY IN THE PACKET.

IN ADDITION, I CAN SAY THAT, UH, THE, THE CHIEF AND OTHER MEMBERS OF OUR MANAGEMENT TEAM DURING THE COURSE OF NEGOTIATIONS WERE HAD A SEPARATE TEAM THAT MADE SOME MORE TECHNICAL AND, AND, UH, LESS CONTROVERSIAL LANGUAGE REVISIONS.

AND, UH, SO HE WAS INVOLVED IN THAT.

AND SO WE'RE HAPPY TO TALK, UH, THE, THE DETAILS OF ANY OF THOSE, IF YOU WISH.

BUT I THINK THAT THEY'RE PRETTY WELL LAID OUT IN, IN THE MATERIALS.

WHAT I'D LIKE TO DO INSTEAD IS, IS TALK ABOUT JUST TWO THINGS THAT, THAT, UM, AREN'T, UH, DISCUSSED IN DETAIL IN THE COUNCIL PACKET MATERIAL THAT YOU HAVE RECEIVED.

AND THAT IS WHY THIS AGREEMENT TOOK THREE AND A HALF YEARS TO FINALIZE AND WHAT THE PRINCIPLE ISSUES WERE.

FIRST OF ALL, I WANNA REALLY EMPHASIZE THAT, UH, NOT ONLY YOU AS MAYOR AND COUNCIL, BUT OUR STAFF AS WELL, UH, GREATLY APPRECIATE THE WORK, UH, THE SACRIFICE, THE COMMITMENT THAT OUR FIREFIGHTERS, UH, HAVE.

UM, AND, UH, AND, AND, UH, THERE IS NEVER, THROUGHOUT THIS THREE AND A HALF YEARS, ANY, ANY REDUCTION OR DIMINUTION OR MINIMIZATION, WHATEVER OF, OF OUR HIGH REGARD FOR THE WORK THAT POLICE, THE, THE FIRE OFFICE FIREFIGHTERS DO.

UM, SO WHY DID IT TAKE THREE AND A HALF YEARS? I MEAN, DURING THE, THE NEGOTIATION PROCESS, UH, COUNSEL WAS FREQUENTLY ASKED THIS QUESTION, SO IT CERTAINLY SHOULD BE ANSWERED.

UH, CERTAINLY THE, THE HARDWORKING MEN AND WOMEN OF THE DECATUR FIRE DEPARTMENT NEED TO KNOW WHAT HAPPENED.

SO WHY IT TOOK SO LONG IS BASICALLY THREE REASONS.

THE, THE FIRST IS THAT AT ALMOST EVERY TURN, UM, WHEN IT WAS TIME FOR GETTING TOGETHER, AGAIN, IT WAS THE CITY THAT HAD TO PULL THE UNION BACK IN INTO NEGOTIATION.

SOMETIMES THREE MONTHS WOULD GO BY FOUR MONTHS, FIVE MONTHS.

AND IN ONE CASE AN ENTIRE YEAR, UH, WHEN WE WOULD ON A MONTHLY BASIS THROUGH OUR, UH, LABOR COUNCIL ATTORNEY SAYING, IT'S TIME TO GET BACK TOGETHER AGAIN.

LET'S HAVE A MEETING.

UH, AND IT WAS, IT WAS ALWAYS THE, THE CITY TRYING TO, YOU KNOW, PULLING, PULLING THE UNION BACK, UH, TO THE TABLE.

UH, TO THEIR CREDIT, THEY CAME.

BUT, UH, UH, THAT, THAT HAPPENED COUNTLESS TIMES.

AND SOMETIMES FOR, AS, LIKE I SAID, FOR MUCH OF A YEAR, THAT, BUT THAT WASN'T THE ONLY REASON FOR THE DELAY.

MIDWAY THROUGH THE, THE NEGOTIATIONS, THE LEADERSHIP OF THE UNION CHANGED, WHICH IS THEIR RIGHT TO DO THAT.

SO THE BARGAINING COMMITTEE DECIDED THAT THEY WERE ALSO ENTITLED TO THROW OUT THE PREVIOUS TENTATIVE AGREEMENTS AND TO START AN ENTIRE NEW PROCESS OVER AGAIN FROM SQUARE ONE.

NOW, WHILE DOING THAT IS NOT ILLEGAL, IT IS UNETHICAL AND IT'S AN UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICE.

UH, AND IT TOOK A LOT OF TIME BECAUSE WE, BECAUSE IT, IT, WE LOST TIME AND HAD TO REGAIN ALL OF THAT GROUND, AND THAT TOOK MONTHS.

THE THIRD REASON THAT IT TOOK SO LONG IS THAT AT A DIFFERENT POINT IN THE NEGOTIATING PROCESS, SOME OF THE UNION LEADERS BEGAN INDIVIDUALLY LOBBYING COUNCIL MEMBERS GOING AROUND THE COLLECTIVE BARGAINING PROCESS AS IT WAS SET FORTH IN STATUTE, AND I THINK REPRESENTED TO THE UNION MEMBERSHIP, THAT THEY COULD SOMEHOW OVERTURN THE NORMAL PROCESS IN THIS WAY.

AND SO THAT ALSO ADDED TO THE PROCESS, UH, IN, IN, IN TERMS OF TIME.

NOW, THAT'S NOT ILLEGAL EITHER, BUT IT'S ALSO, UH, AN UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICE.

UH, SO THE CITY FILED UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICE CHARGES WITH THE STATE LABOR RELATIONS BOARD LATER ON IN THE INTEREST OF REACHING A SETTLEMENT, UH, WITH THE UNION.

IT WAS LATER WITHDRAWN, BUT MAYOR AND COUNCIL, 90% OF THE DELAYS THAT, UH, RESULTED IN THIS THREE AND A HALF YEAR TIMELINE WERE CAUSED BY THESE THREE THINGS, OR SOME COMBINATION OF THEM.

THE GOOD MEN AND WOMEN OF THE FIRE DEPARTMENT ARE ENTITLED TO KNOW AN ANSWER ABOUT WHY THAT TOOK SO LONG.

AND I GENUINELY AND SINCERELY HOPE THAT THEY CAN OBTAIN ANSWERS FROM THEIR LEADERSHIP AS TO WHY THAT HAPPENED.

TO THE ISSUES FROM THE BEGINNING OF UNION NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE FIRE UNION, THERE WERE REALLY ONLY TWO ISSUES THAT MOTIVATED THE CITY.

I MEAN, CERTAINLY THE UNION BROUGHT THEIR ISSUES, UH, TO THE TABLE AS, AS IS PROPER.

NOW, ANY UNION NEGOTIATION INVOLVES SALARY.

THAT'S, THAT'S JUST A GIVEN.

BUT APART FROM THAT, THERE WERE, THERE WERE TWO ISSUES.

THE FIRST ONE HAD TO DO WITH AN ATTEMPT BY THE CITY TO, UH, PURSUE SOME MODEST PENSION REFORM.

AND THE SECOND HAD TO DO WITH OUR DESIRE TO HAVE A UNIFIED, MORE UNIFIED THAN WE HAD BEFORE HEALTH INSURANCE BENEFITS STRUCTURE.

UM, IN APRIL, UM, COUNCILMAN MCDANIEL AND I WERE IN A, UH, HOUSE LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMITTEE MEETING, PACKED STANDING ROOM ONLY OVER AT THE CAPITOL WHERE THE ILLINOIS MUNICIPAL LEAGUE WAS MAKING A PRESENTATION ON THE IMPORTANCE OF THE STATE RESTORING, UH, THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT'S PERCENTAGE ON L G D F.

AND, UH, UM, NEITHER, UH, MR. MCDANIEL OR I GAVE TESTIMONY, UH, AT THAT TIME.

BUT THE, UH, THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE IML, BRAD COLE, HAD ARRANGED FOR 15 MAYORS TO GIVE TESTIMONY REPRESENTING THE, THE BROAD GEOGRAPHIC AND CULTURAL AND ECONOMIC DIVERSITY OF OUR STATE.

AND ALMOST EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM SAID, DON'T

[00:35:01]

TAKE THIS MONEY AWAY FROM US BESIDES THE FACT YOU KEEP GIVING US UNFUNDED MANDATES.

AND THE CHIEF UNFUNDED MANDATE THAT, THAT THEY ALMOST ALL 15 OF THEM MENTIONED, WAS THE INCREASING COST OF PUBLIC SAFETY, UH, PENSIONS.

UM, SO, UH, THE, UM, THIS IS A PROBLEM THROUGHOUT THE STATE.

AND WHILE WE CAN'T FIX THE, UH, SOME OF THE STUFF THAT THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY CONTROLS AND THEY SHOW NO INTEREST IN MAKING ANY SERIOUS CHANGES, THERE ARE SOME THINGS THAT, THAT LOCAL GOVERNMENTS CAN DO.

UH, AND SO WE TRIED TO INSTITUTE SOME OF THOSE IN A WAY THAT, UH, AFFECTED NO EXISTING MEMBER OF, OF THE FIRE UNION.

UM, AND, UH, UH, I AM, I WAS DISAPPOINTED TO TELL YOU THE TRUTH, THAT, THAT BECAUSE WE EVEN SUGGESTED SOME OF THESE THINGS THAT WE WERE ACCUSED OF, OF BEING ANTI FIREFIGHTER, WHICH IS NOT TRUE.

VERY PRO FIREFIGHTER.

THE CITY COUNCIL HAS BEEN REPEATEDLY THROUGH THE YEARS OF VERY INVESTED IN, IN NEW FIRE STATIONS AND EQUIPMENT AND TECHNOLOGY, UH, AND OTHER WAYS TO, TO, TO SUPPORT THE FIRE OPERATION.

BUT THE ASSOCIATED FIREFIGHTERS OF ILLINOIS HAS THIS THING THAT THEY DO.

THEY, IF, IF YOU QUESTION THE, THE PENSION, THEN YOU'RE AGAINST PENSIONS.

YOU DON'T WANT POLICE FIREFIGHTERS TO HAVE PENSIONS AND, AND YOU, UH, UH, AND YOU'RE AGAINST FIREFIGHTERS.

NONE OF THOSE IS TRUE, BUT THAT'S SIDE OF, THAT'S THE POLARIZATION THAT WE FACED.

THE, THE, THE UNION HAS, OVER THE COURSE OF THREE AND A HALF YEARS, FIERCELY RESISTED THESE CHANGES, EVEN THOUGH NO EXISTING EMPLOYEES WERE DISPLACED BY SOME OF THE MODEST PENSION REFORM PROPOSALS THAT WE OFFERED.

UM, AND EVEN THOUGH THE HEALTH PLAN THAT EVERY OTHER CITY EMPLOYEE HAS WAS A BETTER AND, UM, HAD MORE OPTIONS, UH, UH, THAN, THAN THE ONE THAT THEY WANTED TO RETAIN, EVENTUALLY THE CITY COUNCIL INSTRUCTED ME TO SETTLE FOR, UH, BE BECAUSE IT, IT HAD TAKEN THREE YEARS AND UNDERSTANDING THAT WE, UH, NEED TO FIND SOME MODIFIED OR IMP INCREMENTAL WAY OF GETTING THERE.

AND SO, AND SO WE DID EXACTLY THAT.

UM, WE DIDN'T ACHIEVE ALL OF OUR OBJECTIVES.

UM, WE ACHIEVED SOME, EVEN THE REDUCTION OF ONE OF THE 40 HOUR FIRE INSPECTORS SAVES THE CITY CLOSE TO 1.8 MILLION JUST IN PENSION COSTS OVER THE NEXT, UH, 25 YEARS.

SO, SO WE HAD SOME PROGRESS.

THE EVENTUAL AGREEMENT, WHICH IS REFLECTED IN THE SUMMARY THAT YOU HAVE IN YOUR PACKET, UM, DOES NOT ILLUSTRATE ALL OF THIS, UH, DRAMA.

UM, IN ORDER TO HANG ON TO THEIR 17 YEAR OLD HEALTH PLAN, THE UNION SETTLED FOR ONE, WITH FEWER BENEFITS AND FEWER OPTIONS IN ORDER TO RESIST EVEN SOME OF THE MODEST PENSION REFORMS. THE UNION ENDED UP SETTLING FOR A LESSER SALARY ADJUSTMENT THAN HAD PREVIOUSLY BEEN ON THE TABLE, BUT WE CLOSED THE CONTRACT AND IT IS CLOSED NOW FOR ANOTHER YEAR AND A HALF BECAUSE THE CURRENT, UH, THE CONTRACT THAT IS BEFORE YOU NOW RUNS THROUGH, UM, THE END OF DECEMBER OF 2024.

SO, UH, ANOTHER YEAR AND A HALF BEFORE WE HAVE TO DEAL WITH THIS AGAIN.

AND IT, UH, AND I THINK THAT THE COUNCIL'S DECISION TO, UH, SAY, LET'S JUST BRING THIS TO AN END AND DO WHAT WE CAN AND THEN, UH, DEAL WITH THE, WITH OTHER STEPS, UH, DURING THE NEXT NEGOTIATING SESSION, ACKNOWLEDGES THE FACT THAT THE CITY JUST HAS TO, UH, TRY TO ACHIEVE ITS LONG-TERM SUSTAINABILITY OBJECTIVES, MORE INCREMENTALLY.

AND SO THAT'S WHAT WE WILL DO.

AND WE HOPE THE NEXT ONE GOES A LITTLE QUICKER.

THAT'S ALL WE CAN.

QUESTIONS FOR THE MANAGER ABOUT THE CONTRACT OR COMMENTS, MR. CULP? NO QUESTIONS.

CAUSE I THINK WE'D BE HERE ALL NIGHT, JUST A STATEMENT.

THAT BRIEF IS GREAT.

UH, UNNEEDED.

IT WAS POSTED.

LET'S MOVE ON.

LET'S VOTE ON IT.

WE'RE ONLY HEARING ONE SIDE OF THIS AND SPEAKING DRAMA.

WE JUST PLAYED INTO IT BY DOING THAT.

YOU DON'T SPEAK FOR ALL OF US.

I APPRECIATE IT, DR.

HORN.

WELL, RATHER THAN BLAME ENTITIES FOR HOW LONG IT TOOK FOR NEGOTIATIONS TO BECOME FINALIZED, I JUST WANTED TO THANK EVERYONE INVOLVED IN THE NEGOTIATIONS FOR YOUR VERY LONG HOURS AND YOUR TIRELESS EFFORTS TO ACHIEVE AN AGREEMENT THAT WAS AGREED TO BY BOTH SIDES.

I ALSO WANNA THANK THE DECATUR FIREFIGHTERS FOR THE WORK THAT YOU DO EVERY DAY TO PROTECT THE LIVES, THE SAFETY, AND THE PROPERTY OF OUR CITIZENS.

DECATUR CITIZENS ARE VERY FORTUNATE TO HAVE SUCH DEDICATED AND COURAGEOUS PUBLIC SERVANTS.

I HAVE PERSONALLY WITNESSED DECATUR FIREFIGHTERS SAVE PEOPLE'S LIVES UNDER CHALLENGING CIRCUMSTANCES.

AND I HAVE WITNESSED FIRSTHAND VERY DIFFICULT CHALLENGES THAT FIREFIGHTERS HAVE FACED.

AND I, I CAN'T IMAGINE THE DEPTH OF 30 YEARS OF THOSE TYPES OF EXPERIENCES AND HOW THAT IMPACTS PEOPLE.

AND FINALLY, I WOULD JUST MENTION THAT IN AN ERA OF CITIES POPULATION DECLINE, THE NEED FOR FIREFIGHTERS CONTINUES TO INCREASE.

WE HAD A RECORD NUMBER OF ALARMS LAST YEAR, AND THAT NUMBER IS ON TRACK TO BE BROKEN AGAIN THIS YEAR.

SO

[00:40:01]

THANK YOU TO THE FIREFIGHTERS AND THANK YOU TO EVERYONE WHO NEGOTIATED THIS AGREEMENT.

ANY OTHER COMMENTS FROM COUNCIL? SCENE NONE.

COUNCILMAN KEEL.

AYE.

COUNCILMAN CULP? AYE.

COUNCILMAN COOPER? AYE.

COUNCILMAN MCDANIEL? AYE.

COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY AYE.

COUNCILMAN HORN? AYE.

MAYOR MOR WOLF.

AYE.

SEVEN AYES KNOWN AS ITEM FIVE

[5.  Resolution Authorizing the Purchase of Twelve (12) Opticom GPS Intersection Radio Units and Accessories from Traffic Control Corporation for Emergency Vehicle Preemption Systems]

RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF 12 OPTICUM GPS INTERSECTION RADIO UNITS AND ACCESSORIES FROM TRAFFIC CONTROL CORPORATION FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLE PREEMPTION SYSTEMS. MOTION, THE RESOLUTION TO PASS AND BE ADOPTED.

SO MOVED.

SECOND, MR. RIGHTON.

AS YOU MAY RECALL, THE UM, UP UPGRADE OF INTERSECTIONS IS SOMETHING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL HAS BEEN WORKING ON, UH, FOR A PERIOD OF SEVERAL YEARS UNDER THE LEADERSHIP OF CHIEF ABBOTT.

UM, SO IF YOU COULD GIVE US SOME SENSE OF WHERE WE'RE AT IS, ARE THESE THE LAST 12 OR WE HAVE SOME MORE TO GO.

THE, THESE WILL BE THE, THE LAST 12 OF OUR GOAL OF AROUND 50.

AND THEN FROM HERE ON OUT, IT WOULD BE ONE OR TWO OR THREE A YEAR, WHATEVER WE IDENTIFY AS BEING A PROBLEM INTERSECTION.

ANY QUESTIONS FOR CHIEF ABBOTT? SO THIS IS A COMPANION ITEM.

THERE'S, THERE'S ACTUALLY TWO HERE.

THEY, THEY RELATE TO THE SAME 12 INTERSECTIONS.

UH, ONE IS TO BUY THE EQUIPMENT AND THE OTHER IS TO HAVE A, HAVE A DIFFERENT, UM, CONTRACTOR DO THE INSTALLATIONS.

MR. KEEL.

SO HOW ARE THEY WORKING NOW THAT YOU HAVE ALL THESE OVER, OVER TOWN? THEY'RE, THEY'RE NOT WITHOUT CHALLENGES.

UM, LIKE RE WE HAVE SOME ISSUES WITH DOWNTOWN AND, UH, WE WORK WELL WITH PUBLIC WORKS.

PUBLIC WORKS, GOES OUT AND TRIES TO FIX 'EM AND, AND FIND OUT WHAT THE PROBLEMS ARE.

BUT, YOU KNOW, I WOULD SAY I WOULD LOVE TO BE ABLE TO, TO GIVE YOU A SHEET OF PAPER AND SAY, HERE'S THE RESPONSE.

TIME CHANGES.

BUT BECAUSE OF MOVING FIRE STATIONS AND CHANGING OUR RECORD MANAGEMENT PROGRAM, I DON'T HAVE THE DATA TO TELL YOU THAT THIS IS IMPROVED.

ANECDOTALLY THOUGH, YOU KNOW, IT DOESN'T TAKE A GENIUS TO FIGURE OUT IF I DON'T HAVE TO STOP.

RIGHT.

I'M GETTING THERE QUICKER.

AND I THINK WE HAVE SURROUNDED MUCH OF THE JOHNS HILL AREA, NOT BECAUSE THAT'S WHERE THE CITY CHOSE TO, UM, UH, CONCENTRATE ON NEIGHBORHOOD REDEVELOPMENT.

BUT WHEN THEY MOVED STATION ONE ALMOST 30 YEARS AGO, THEY CREATED A LITTLE BIT OF A GAP OVER IN JOHNS HILL AREA WHERE WE, WHERE WE GET THERE AND WE ALL GET THERE ABOUT THE SAME TIME, BUT THERE WAS A LITTLE BIT OF A GAP FROM FIRE STATION.

SO THIS ALLOWS THE GUYS FROM STATION ONE, STATION SIX, STATION TWO TO, TO CONVERGE IN JOHNS HILL MUCH QUICKER.

SO I THINK IT'S BEEN A SUCCESS, BUT IT DOES HAVE ITS CHALLENGES.

COUNCILMAN MCDANIEL CHIEF WITH, UH, PEOPLE RUNNING RED LIGHTS, HAS THAT BEEN A PROBLEM? WHEN THE LIGHTS CHANGE RED, I THINK THAT'S A PROBLEM WHETHER YOU'RE GOING TO AN EMERGENCY OR NOT.

WELL, YOU KNOW, I THINK IT WAS SPRINGFIELD JUST RECENTLY, SOMEBODY RAN THROUGH AND KNOCKED OVER THE FIRETRUCK ON ITS SIDE.

THAT'S HOW FAST SHE SHE WAS GOING AND THAT SHE RAN A RED LIGHT IS WHAT WE HAVE.

WE HAVE PROBLEMS WITH PEOPLE WHO DON'T YIELD TO EMERGENCY VEHICLES.

WE HAVE PROBLEMS WHO, WITH PEOPLE WHO JUST STOP IN FRONT OF THEM.

SO AS FAR AS A RED LIGHT, I DON'T THINK WE'VE HAD AN INCIDENT YET WHERE SOMEBODY'S RAN A RED LIGHT AND HIT THE FIRE APPARATUS, BUT WE HAVE HAD 'EM HIT FIRE APPARATUS THAT ARE PARKED ON SCENE.

ANY OTHER COMMENTS FROM COUNCIL? THANK YOU CHIEF.

SEEING NONE.

COUNCILMAN QL? AYE.

COUNCILMAN COLT? AYE.

COUNCILMAN COOPER? AYE.

COUNCILMAN MCDANIEL? AYE.

COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY AYE.

COUNCILMAN HORN? AYE.

MAYOR MOORE WOLF AYE.

SEVEN AYES NO NAYS.

A SIX RESOLUTION

[6.  Resolution Authorizing the Installation of Twelve (12) Opticom GPS Intersection Radio Units and Accessories by Egizii Electric Inc for Emergency Vehicle Preemption Systems]

AUTHORIZING THE INSTALLATION OF 12 OPTUM GPS INTERSECTION RADIO UNITS AND ACCESSORIES BY II ELECTRIC INC.

FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLE PREEMPTION SYSTEMS. MOTION OF THE RESOLUTION TO PASS AND BE ADOPTED.

SO MOVED.

SECOND.

ANYTHING TO ADD, GENTLEMEN? NO.

ANY QUESTIONS? SEE NONE.

COUNCILMAN KUHL? AYE.

COUNCILMAN COOPER? AYE.

COUNCILMAN MCDANIEL? AYE.

COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY? AYE.

COUNCILMAN HORN? AYE.

MAYOR MOORE WOLF.

AYE.

SIX AYES KNOWN AS ITEM SEVEN, RESOLUTION

[7.  Resolution Authorizing City of Decatur to Enter Into a Purchase Agreement for the Purchase of Three (3) Pierce Saber Fire Apparatus and Agreement for Debt Financing of Apparatus]

AUTHORIZING CITY OF DECATUR TO ENTER INTO A PURCHASE AGREEMENT FOR THE PURCHASE OF THREE PIERCE SABER FIRE APPARATUS AND AGREEMENT FOR DEBT FINANCING OF APPARATUS MOTION AT THE RESOLUTION DO PASS AND BE ADOPTED.

SO MOVED.

SECOND.

IT'S KINDA LIKE THE FIRE DEPARTMENT NIGHT, ISN'T IT? SO, UM, IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING AT LEAST FROM, UH, THE HISTORY THAT, UH, CHIEF ABBOTT HAS HELPED ME WITH IS THAT BY, AND THREE FIRE TRUCKS ALL AT THE SAME TIME IS NOT THE NORM.

AND SO LET'S TALK A I WANNA TALK VERY BRIEFLY ABOUT WHY WE'RE BRINGING THAT TO YOU.

UM, THE, THE PANDEMIC, UH, IMPACTED, UH, THE FACTORIES THAT MAKE FIRE APPARATUS.

SO SOME OF THEM SHUT DOWN AND WHOLE OR IN PART, UM, AND THEN, UH, THEY CAME BACK AND THEY GOT ALL THESE BACK ORDERS.

UM, A R P ALLOWS YOU TO, ALTHOUGH WE AREN'T SPENDING A R P MONEY ON FIRE APPARATUS, UH, IT, IT IS AN ELIGIBLE EXPENSE.

AND SO SOME CITIES ARE, AND THEY'RE, AND THEY GOT ALL THESE BACK ORDERS, UM, AND INFLATION BEING WHAT IT IS, UH, WE DIDN'T WANNA HAVE TO WAIT TWO YEARS, THREE YEARS AND THEN PAY A PRICE THAT FAR AHEAD OF TIME.

SO, UH, THE CHIEF SPENT A LOT OF TIME ON THIS AND, UH, WE'RE GONNA ORDER THREE, SOME

[00:45:01]

OF WHICH WE WON'T SEE FOR SEVERAL YEARS.

BUT THE GOOD NEWS IS WE'VE LOCKED IN THE 2023, UH, PRICING ON IT FOR A LOT OF DIFFERENT REASONS.

AND SO YOU ARE AUTHORIZING BOTH THE ACQUISITION OF THEM, EVEN THOUGH THEY WON'T HIT THE BUDGET FOR A WHILE, AS WELL AS THE FINANCING OF THEM IN THE PAST.

ALTHOUGH, UH, PIERCE AND OTHER FIRE APPARATUS MANUFACTURERS MAKE AVAILABLE SOME OF THEIR OWN FINANCING HOUSES, SORT OF LIKE CAR DEALERS DO, WE'VE ALWAYS BEEN ABLE TO FIND CHEAPER FINANCING OUR OURSELVES.

UH, SO THIS ROLLS IT ALL TOGETHER AND, BUT THIS IS A MULTI-YEAR OBLIGATION.

IT'S MORE THAN 2 MILLION AS, AS THE CHIEF'S REPORT MENTIONS.

CHIEF, ANYTHING MORE YOU WANNA ADD? GOOD.

THAT'S FINE.

YEAH, I'M, I'M OKAY WITH THAT.

JUST, YOU KNOW, YOU'RE BROUGHT UP TO STAND THERE AND CAN ASK, I CAN ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.

OKAY.

GO AHEAD.

MR. K.

SO AGAIN, WALK ME THROUGH THE FINANCING.

ARE WE PAYING FOR THIS NOW OR ARE WE JUST ORDERING IT AND PAYING FOR IT DOWN THE ROAD, OR, BECAUSE I THOUGHT I SAW SOMETHING IN HERE THAT IF WE PAY IN ADVANCE, WE GET A DISCOUNT.

SO I WAS JUST TRYING TO, WE'VE DONE THAT IN THE PAST WHERE WE PAY UP FRONT AND WE GET A DISCOUNT.

AND IN THIS CASE, WITH INFLATION, IT'S BEEN DETERMINED THAT IT'S BETTER TO WAIT UNTIL THE APPARATUS IS DELIVERED BEFORE WE PAY FOR 'EM.

SO TH THIS, THIS PARTICULAR, UH, PURCHASE WILL BE, YOU KNOW, IT COULD BE THREE YEARS BEFORE THEY COME IN 30 MONTHS TO 36 MONTHS.

SO WE'RE GONNA, WE'RE GONNA FINANCE 'EM WHEN THEY COME IN.

I, I DON'T EVEN KNOW IF THIS MAKES SENSE, BUT, YOU KNOW, OUR GENERAL FUND, I GUESS WE CAN WAIT AND SEE HOW WE GO, BUT OUR GENERAL FUND'S DOING PRETTY WELL.

AND IF I'M NOT MISTAKEN, EACH DAY IS $250,000.

IF YOU TOOK 10 DAYS OFF OUT OF OUR GENERAL FUND, THAT WOULD PAY FOR THESE FIRE TRUCKS AND IT WOULD PUT US DOWN TO 97 DAYS.

I THINK WE'RE AT 107 NOW.

I DON'T KNOW IF THAT MAKES SENSE.

IT'S JUST FOOD FOR THOUGHT, BUT, UM, I KNOW OUR GENERAL FUND WERE A LITTLE CONCERNED WITH INFLATION ON EVERYTHING, BUT IT WAS JUST SOMETHING THAT CROSSED MY MIND NOT KNOWING, UH, WHAT THE CONDITION OF THE GENERAL FUND WILL BE IN 2026 WHEN SOME OF THESE ARE DELIVERED.

I THINK THAT THE ACTION THAT'S RECOMMENDED IS MORE PRUDENT.

UM, UH, ENTERING INTO THIS OBLIGATION DOES NOT MEAN THAT WE CAN'T CHANGE OUR MIND AND SAY, WE WE'RE IN BETTER POSITION IN 2026.

LET'S, LET'S ADVANCE PAY IT.

UM, YOU, YOU STILL HAVE THAT OPTION.

THERE'S, THERE'S, THERE'S NOT A PENALTY IF YOU GET OUT AND PAY THE MONEY.

I JUST, I JUST THOUGHT IT WAS WORTH DISCUSSING.

DR.

HORN.

YEAH, I'LL ECHO COUNCILMAN UL'S SENTIMENTS HERE.

I I MEAN, EVEN IF YOU LOOK AT IT AS A BORROWING FROM THE GENERAL FUND AND PAYING BACK OVER FIVE OR SIX YEARS, THE DIFFERENCE WOULD BE THAT WE WOULDN'T HAVE TO PAY A 5% INTEREST RATE ON THAT 2 MILLION.

AND SO I THINK THERE'S A WAY, EVEN THOUGH IT, IT WILL IMMEDIATELY BE $2 MILLION IF YOU'RE GONNA GIVE, PAY THAT OFF OVER FIVE YEARS, YOU'RE ALREADY GIVING BACK $500,000 TO THE GENERAL FUND WITHOUT INTEREST THAT FIRST YEAR.

SO I THINK THERE MIGHT BE A WAY TO SELF-FINANCE THESE WORTH LOOKING AT.

UH, MR. MCDANIEL, AGAIN, WE HAVE TO BE CAUTIOUS.

UH, THE EXPERTS ARE STILL SAYING THEY THE, UH, THIS THIS QUARTER AND NEXT YEAR, UH, RECESSION COULD BE HITTING US.

SOME SAY WE'RE IN RECESSION NOW, SO, UH, WE NEED TO HOLD ON TO OUR MONEY.

ANYTHING COULD HAPPEN BY 2026.

SO, BUT STILL WE HAVE TO BE CAUTIOUS.

INFLATION IS NOT GOING TO GO AWAY FOR SEVERAL YEARS.

OTHER COMMENTS, QUESTIONS? SCENE NONE.

COUNCILMAN KUHL? AYE.

COUNCILMAN COOPER? AYE.

COUNCILMAN MCDANIEL? AYE.

COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY? AYE.

COUNCILMAN HORN? AYE.

MAYOR MOORE WOLF.

AYE.

SIX AYES, NO NAYS.

ITEM EIGHT.

ORDINANCE AMENDING

[8.  Ordinance Amending City Code Chapter 54.1 Video Gaming License]

CITY CODE CHAPTER 54.1 VIDEO GAMING LICENSE.

MOTION OF THE ORDINANCE TO PASS AND BE ADOPTED.

SO MOVED.

SECOND, MR. WRIGHTON HEARING AND COUNSEL, AS WAS MENTIONED DURING THE CITIZEN PARTICIPATION SECTION, UM, IT WAS YOUR DIRECTION THAT WE PREPARE, UH, AN EXTENSION OF THE MORATORIUM.

THAT'S ALL THIS DOES.

THERE IS, THERE IS NOTHING IN THIS, UH, ACTION THAT DEALS WITH THE SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES THAT YOU HAVE TABLED WITH REGARD TO VIDEO GAMING.

THIS JUST EXTENDS THE, THE MORATORIUM UNTIL EITHER THE END OF THE YEAR, DECEMBER 31ST, 2023 OR UNTIL YOU WOULD REPEAL IT, WHICHEVER COMES FIRST.

AND MR. JACKSON HAD ASKED TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM.

UM, AND WE WILL TRY TO ALSO, DURING OUR DISCUSSION, MR. JACKSON, ANSWER A COUPLE OF THE QUESTIONS THAT YOU RAISED EARLIER.

UM, ON, UM, LAST MONTH OR WHEN WE SPOKE OR YOU GUYS HAD A MEETING, UH, SOME, SOME OF THE INFORMATION THAT CAME FORWARD WAS THE CITIZENS OF DECATUR HAVE LOUDLY AND CLEARLY SPOKEN.

85%, 76%, 63%, OKAY, BUT NOWHERE IN THAT PERCENTAGE WAS IT, GIVEN HOW MANY PEOPLE ACTUALLY RESPONDED.

UH, MAYOR, YOU ACTUALLY DID MENTION THAT 800 PEOPLE, APPROXIMATELY

[00:50:01]

70,000 PEOPLE IN OUR CITY RESPONDED.

SO YOU'RE FOCUSING, EXCUSE ME, THE SKY IS FALLING FOR 1.15% OF THE POPULATION.

REALLY? THAT'S WHAT WE'RE FOCUSING ON.

LESS THAN 2% OF THE PEOPLE MADE ANY COMMENT.

GAMBLING'S A BIG PROBLEM, BUT LESS THAN ONE AND A HALF PERCENT PEOPLE RESPONDED.

REALLY? LET'S, LET'S THINK ABOUT THAT IN A BETTER WAY.

OF THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE, OF SMALL BUSINESS OWNERS THAT CAME HERE, 100% OF THEM CAME UP AND SPOKE AGAINST THE CHANGES THAT YOU WERE PROPOSING TO DO THERE.

I I DON'T KNOW HOW MUCH MORE TO PUT THAT INTO PERSPECTIVE.

YOUR SMALL BUSINESSES ARE OPPOSED TO MAKING THIS INCREASED FEE, THIS CLASS V LICENSE.

YOU HAVE IT WITHIN YOUR POWER TO NOT PASS THAT.

AGAIN, AS I MENTIONED EARLIER, I THINK THE BETTER WAY TO DO THIS IS TO GET REPRESENTATIVES FROM ALL THOSE DIFFERENT CLASSES, SIT DOWN WITH THE PEOPLE THAT DID THE DRAFT AND HASH OUT WHERE CHANGES CAN BE MADE, WHERE CHANGES CAN'T BE MADE.

YOU ALSO TALKED ABOUT A CAP.

UH, AGAIN, WE'VE GOT TO CLARIFY AND PUT OUT NUMBERS THE WAY THEY ARE.

IT WAS MENTIONED THAT WE HAVE A HUNDRED ESTABLISHMENTS.

NO, WE DON'T HAVE A HUNDRED ESTABLISHMENTS ACCORDING TO THE I G B.

WE HAVE 89.

YOU PUT A CAP AT 80.

OKAY, HOW DO WE GET BELOW THAT? WHAT NINE ESTABLISHMENTS ARE YOU GONNA TELL YOU DON'T GET A LICENSE NEXT YEAR? OR ARE WE GONNA GO DO THIS THROUGH ATTRITION? WE NEED TO WORK THROUGH THIS TOGETHER.

AND AGAIN, I THINK IT NEEDS TO BE DONE AS A TEAM, AS A SHAREHOLDERS, SO THAT WAY YOU GET BUY-IN FROM THE FOLKS THAT ARE TRULY AFFECTING.

THANK YOU.

THANK YOU MR. JACKSON.

AND JUST A COUPLE OF NOTES TO CLARIFY.

UM, ABSOLUTELY NO DECISIONS WERE MADE.

THIS WAS A DISCUSSION ITEM FOR US TO TRY AND GET SOME IDEAS ON, ON WHAT POSSIBLY THE COUN, WHAT ACTIONS THE COUNCIL COULD TAKE, WHAT MIGHT BE SUPPORTED, WHAT MIGHT NOT BE SUPPORTED.

AND SO EVEN THOUGH THERE MAY BE, HAVE BEEN ALL SORTS OF THINGS IN THAT, THAT WE WILL NEVER, THAT WILL NEVER SEE THE LIGHT OF DAY BECAUSE THERE MAY NOT BE CONSENSUS AT ALL.

SO IT'S, IT WAS A DISCUSSION ITEM TO GET US TALKING AND THINKING ABOUT IT.

AND YOU'RE ABSOLUTELY RIGHT.

800 PEOPLE ANSWERING A SURVEY IS NOT STATISTICALLY VALID BY ANY STRETCH OF THE IMAGINATION.

SO IT'S, IT'S NOT, UM, IT'S NOT LIKE THE PEOPLE HAVE SPOKEN, SPOKEN, IT'S A PORTION OF THE COMMUNITY HAS SAID, WE DON'T LIKE IT.

SO, MS. GREGORY, I WANNA JUST PIGGYBACK ON WHAT, UM, THE MAYOR JUST SAID.

THERE WAS ONLY ONE COUNCIL PERSON HERE THAT SAID AND USED THE PHRASE, THE PEOPLE HAVE SPOKEN, ONE COUNCILMAN DOES NOT SPEAK FOR THE REST OF US.

I BELIEVE THAT EVEN DURING THAT DEBATE, THE MAYOR, UM, RECOGNIZED THAT THE STATISTICS WERE WHAT THEY, WHAT THEY ARE.

SO I JUST WANNA BE REALLY CLEAR ABOUT THAT.

AND, AND, UM, THE MAYOR IS ALSO RIGHT.

WE HAVEN'T MADE ANY DECISIONS YET.

UM, I'M NOT SURE THAT WE HAVE CONSENSUS AMONG THIS COUNCIL.

SO WE WILL CONTINUE THE CONVERSATION.

UM, AND FOR NOW WE HAVE A MORATORIUM.

SO IN ESSENCE IT'S A CAP ON ANY MORE GROWTH.

SO THAT'S WHERE WE STAND TODAY.

COUNCILMAN MCDANIELS? I WAS JUST GONNA SAY, NOT EVERYBODY WILL DO A SURVEY.

NOW ALL OF US GET AROUND THE COMMUNITY, UH, YOU KNOW, WE'VE TALKED ABOUT THIS.

PEOPLE HAVE TALKED ABOUT IT SINCE IT, IT WAS IN, YOU KNOW, STARTED WAY BACK.

SO THERE'S LOTS OF PEOPLE THAT ARE, UH, OPPOSED TO IT, BUT THEY JUST DON'T DO THE SURVEYS.

SO THERE'S MORE PEOPLE OUT THERE THAT ARE TOTALLY OPPOSED IT THAN TOOK THE SURVEY.

THAT'S WHAT I'M TRYING TO SAY.

COUNCILMAN MCGREGOR AND COUNCIL MCDANIEL IS ACTUALLY CORRECT.

I'VE HEARD FROM MORE PEOPLE IN OPPOSITION SINCE WE HAD THE DEBATE THAN I HEARD BEFORE WE EVEN BEGAN THE DEBATE.

UM, SO I'M SURE THAT MOST OF US ARE KEEPING A RUNNING RECORD OF WHOSE CALLS AND WHAT THEIR, WHAT THEIR ISSUES ARE.

AND IT'S NOT A SIMPLE PROCESS BY ANY STRETCH OF THE IMAGINATION, WHICH IS WHY THE COUNCIL IS LOOKING AT TAKING THE RIGHT AMOUNT OF TIME TO SIT DOWN AND SAY, WHAT, WHAT IS THE REAL IMPACT HERE? BECAUSE QUITE FRANKLY, TRYING TO DO THE RIGHT THING OR, OR WHAT WE FEEL REPRESENTS A MAJORITY OF THE COMMUNITY OR THE PEOPLE THAT, THAT REACH OUT TO US, UM, MAY NOT HAVE THE DESIRED IMPACT THAT WE REALLY WANT.

WE MIGHT NOT ACCOMPLISH ANYTHING.

AND THAT GOES TO THE PARLOR LICENSES.

[00:55:01]

UM, WE TOOK, WE PUT A MORATORIUM ON PARLER LICENSES AND BASICALLY TO LIMIT THE NUMBER WE WOULD HAVE, WE CUT IT FROM 26 TO 20, SOMETHING LIKE THAT.

UM, IT HASN'T CHANGED ANYTHING.

DIDN'T MOVE, IT DIDN'T MOVE THE NEEDLE AT ALL BECAUSE THE PARLORS ARE MAKING A LOT OF MONEY.

THEY'RE NOT GOING OUTTA BUSINESS.

SO WE, WE WILL BE HAVING MORE DISCUSSION IN TALKS.

I'M SURE, UH, MANY OF US HAVE HAD PEOPLE REACH OUT TO US INDIVIDUALLY THAT, THAT DO OPERATE, UH, THE VARIOUS ENTITIES IN TOWN TO SAY, THIS IS WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE AT MY BUSINESS.

SO I'VE MET WITH A COUPLE OF THOSE AND WE'LL BE HAPPY TO MEET WITH YOU AS WELL.

OTHER, YES, PAT, AS FAR AS I'M CONCERNED, AND I THINK A LOT OF WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO DO IS NOBODY WANTS TO PARLORS, BUT WE HAVE A LOT OF BUSINESSES THAT HAVE BECOME PARLORS.

SO THAT'S WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO CORRECT.

YOU KNOW, IF YOU'RE A RESTAURANT, YOU'RE A RESTAURANT, YOU'RE NOT A PARLOR.

YOU HAVE TO SERVE FOOD TO BE ABLE, YOU KNOW, TO, YOU KNOW, IN LIQUOR TO BE ABLE TO HAVE, UH, VIDEO GAMING.

SO WE'VE GOT BUSINESSES THAT HAVE ACTUALLY HAVE BECOME PARLORS THAT SHOULD NOT BE, YOU KNOW, THEY'RE A BAR OR THEY'RE A RESTAURANT.

THEY'RE NOT JUST A PARLOR.

AND THAT'S WHAT A LOT OF 'EM, THAT'S WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO STOP.

AND THOSE THAT ARE TRYING TO GET AROUND THE RULES THAT ARE SET UP TO PRETEND TO BE A RESTAURANT WHEN THEY'RE, THEY'RE NOT REALLY COUNCILMAN HORN.

WELL, I'LL SAY A A COUPLE OF THINGS HERE.

FIRST OF ALL, UM, LESS THAN 15% OF ELIGIBLE VOTERS VOTE IN MUNICIPAL ELECTIONS, AND OVER 90% OF THEM ARE OVER THE AGE OF 50.

AND SO WE COULD, WE COULD VALIDLY ASK THE QUESTION, IS, UH, THE CITY COUNCIL A REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLE OF THE VIEWPOINTS OF THE PEOPLE OF DECATUR? OR IS IT A REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLE OF THE PEOPLE WHO VOTE? UM, SAME THING APPLIES FOR THIS SURVEY.

I THINK THE THE QUESTION HAS TO BE BECOME, WHY ISN'T IT A REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLE? UM, CITY STAFF HAD THE OPPORTUNITY AND WERE ASKED TO CONSIDER USING A PROFESSIONAL SURVEY COMPANY, AND THEY DECLINED TO DO SO.

THEY ARGUED THAT, UH, THE STAFF WAS MORE THAN CAPABLE OF, UM, DOING THE SURVEY AND THEY DID IT.

AND, UH, THAT SURVEY WENT OUT TO, UM, THE MAJOR MEDIA COMPANIES IN THE CITY OF DECATUR, AND IT WENT OUT IN SOCIAL MEDIA AND OTHER FORMATS THROUGH CITY OF DECATUR, UM, ENTITIES.

SO IF, IF YOU'RE ARGUING THAT IT'S NOT A REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLE, WHY I, I THINK THAT IT IS A REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLE AND I HAVE NO REASON TO THINK THAT IT ISN'T A REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLE.

AND 85% OF THE PEOPLE WHO RESPOND TO THAT SURVEY SAID THERE ARE TOO MANY ESTABLISHMENTS GAMBLING ESTABLISHMENTS IN THE CITY OF DECATUR.

PERIOD.

AND IF WE WANT TO, I SUPPOSE IN THE NEXT SIX MONTHS, WE COULD HIRE A PROFESSIONAL COMPANY TO RUN THIS SURVEY TOO.

DOES ANYBODY REALLY EXPECT THAT NUMBER TO BE THAT DRASTICALLY DIFFERENT? I CERTAINLY DON'T.

SO THE, WHAT WE'RE DOING TONIGHT IS WE'RE VOTING TO EXTEND THE MOR MORATORIUM ON VIDEO GAMBLING ESTABLISHMENTS, NEW VIDEO GAMBLING ESTABLISHMENTS.

AND I THINK WE SHOULD, THE RESIDENTS OF DECATUR ABSOLUTELY WANT FEWER GAMBLING ESTABLISHMENTS.

AND OVER THE NEXT SIX MONTHS OR LESS, WE SHOULD AS A CITY COUNCIL, HEED THE ADVICE OF THE RESIDENTS.

ANY OTHER COMMENTS ON THIS ITEM, MR. WRIGHTON? MAYOR AND COUNCIL? UM, THE USE OF THE SURVEY WAS NOT SOMETHING THAT YOU ACTUALLY REQUESTED.

IT WAS SOMETHING THAT STAFF INITIATED, UM, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOU, OF COURSE, AS, UM, BUT UH, OUR LOGIC FOR THAT WASN'T WAS THAT WE KNEW THAT ONCE WE BEGAN THIS PROCESS, THAT YOU WOULD HEAR FROM THE LIQUOR LICENSE HOLDERS AND, AND WE'RE PLEASED TO HAVE, HAVE THAT INPUT, BUT THAT WE FELT IT WAS IMPORTANT TO HAVE SOME OFFSETTING COMMENT AND INPUT.

AND ONE WAY TO DO THAT WAS, WAS A SURVEY.

DOES THIS MEET THE, THE GALLUP STANDARD FOR, FOR HAVING PRETESTED? UM, YOU KNOW, I MEAN THEY'LL, THEY'LL DO A, A SURVEY THAT ONLY INVOLVES 900 PEOPLE.

IT'S NATIONWIDE BECAUSE THEY HAVE, UH, IDENTIFIED CERTAIN SOCIOECONOMIC GROUPS, WHATEVER.

AND, AND SOMEHOW THAT'S SUPPOSED TO BE REPRESENTATIVE.

DID WE DO THAT? NO.

UM, UH, WOULD IT HAVE BEEN A COSTLY EXERCISE FOR US TO DO IT? YES.

UH, SO I DIDN'T THINK THAT IT WAS NECESSARY TO DO, AND I STILL DON'T, BUT I THINK IT WAS VALUABLE FEEDBACK.

EVEN, EVEN IF IT DOESN'T MEET THE GALLUP STANDARD OF STATISTICAL RELIABILITY, IT IS REASONABLE TO BELIEVE THAT THAT, THAT THIS IS USEFUL INFORMATION TO YOUR PROCESS.

AND I BELIEVE THAT IT WAS, UH, NOT, NOT JUST THE RESULTS OF THE, OF THE RESPONSE TO THE FIVE QUESTIONS, BUT ALSO TO THE OTHER COMMENTARY.

I THINK ANECDOTALLY, MANY OF YOU HAVE TOLD ME THAT, THAT WHETHER IT'S, YOU KNOW, MEETS THE GALLUP STANDARD OR NOT, IT WOULD STILL REFLECTED

[01:00:01]

WHAT YOU WERE HEARING ON THE STREET.

AND SO IN THAT REGARD, IT AUGMENTED WHAT YOU, WHAT YOU WERE OTHERWISE GONNA GET, WHICH WAS ONLY COMMENT BACK FROM, FROM, FROM THE LIQUOR DEALERS.

SO I, I THINK THAT IT WAS A VALUABLE INPUT IN, INTO THE PROCESS, GIVEN THE AMOUNT OF MONEY AND PEOPLE PLAYING THESE MACHINES, I DOUBT THAT THE PEOPLE WHO ARE GOING GAMING RESPONDED AT ALL, OR WE'D SEE, BECAUSE THERE'S GOTTA BE A LOT OF THOSE PEOPLE OUT THERE CUZ THERE'S AN AWFUL LOT OF MONEY GOING THROUGH CHUCK.

WELL, I'VE BEEN ON THIS COUNCIL SIX YEARS NOW AND THERE'S SO MANY ISSUES THAT COME UP AND THERE'S PEOPLE ON BOTH SIDES OF EVERY ISSUE.

AND A LOT OF TIMES IT'S 50 50 OR THIS OR THAT.

AND FRANKLY, IT JUST COMES WITH THESE SEVEN COUNCIL MEMBERS HERE.

IT'S WHAT WE DECIDE.

UH, WE WANT THE INPUT, BUT YOU CAN THROW ALL THE SURVEYS AND RESULTS TO ME THAT YOU WANT.

BUT IT REALLY COMES DOWN TO HOW I FEEL ABOUT IT AND WHAT CITIZENS SAY TO ME.

SO I, I KIND OF TAKE AND SURVEYS THAT THEY THINK TWEAK THOSE QUESTIONS IN A LOT OF DIFFERENT WAYS TO MAKE YOU VOTE ONE OR, YOU KNOW, VOTE ONE WAY OR THE OTHER.

SO I DON'T, I TAKE 'EM WITH A GRAIN OF SALT AND I'M BASICALLY GONNA VOTE MY CONSCIENCE, MR. COOPER.

UM, I KIND OF ECHO THOSE COMMENTS, BUT, UM, SURVEY IS JUST THAT AS A SURVEY.

UM, AND YOU CAN TAKE IT OR LEAVE IT RATHER IT'S UP TO US THEN AS INDIVIDUALS TO DECIDE WHAT'S BEST FOR OUR CITY.

UH, THAT'S WHY YOU PUT US HERE.

UM, A FEW YEARS AGO THEY HAD A, UH, QUESTION ON THE, UM, ON THE BALLOT REGARDING CANNABIS.

AND IT, THE MAJORITY SAID YES FOR THAT, BUT THE COUNCIL DECIDED TO GO AGAINST THAT.

SO THEY FELT THEY STILL WENT, WHAT THEY FELT WAS BEST FOR THE CITY.

SO THAT'S HOW YOU KIND OF GOTTA LOOK AT IT.

UM, AND, AND YOU WOULDN'T GO OUT AND, AND ASK THOSE SAME PEOPLE THAT RES 800 PEOPLE THAT RESPONDED THE OTHER WEEK TO THE SURVEY AND YOU DO IT AGAIN WITH THOSE SAME 800 PEOPLE.

YOU'RE NOT GONNA GET THE SAME RESULTS.

CAUSE SOME OF 'EM GONNA BE TO CHANGE THEIR MIND.

SO, UM, BUT IT IS GOOD INFORMATION TO KNOW WHAT THE PEOPLE WANT OR WHAT THE PEOPLE, SOME PEOPLE THINK AND WHAT THEY FEEL.

AND IT GIVES US AN IDEA AS FAR AS WHEN WE'RE LOOKING AT THE NUTS AND BOLTS ON WHAT DIRECTION WE SHOULD GO THAT WE FEEL IS BEST FOR OUR CITY.

DR.

HORN, I'LL JUST POINT OUT THAT NEARLY 500 PEOPLE WROTE WRITTEN COMMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH THAT SURVEY AND PERHAPS, UH, OUR, UM, PUBLIC RELATIONS PERSON CAN PUT THOSE COMMENTS ONLINE FOR PEOPLE TO READ BECAUSE I CAN CONSIDER THAT 500 DIRECT COMMENTS, UH, THAT ARE COMING TO THE CITY COUNCIL.

UM, AND UM, THE OTHER THING THAT I WOULD POINT OUT ABOUT THIS SURVEY IS IF, AT, IF ANYTHING, THIS SURVEY WAS SKEWED TOWARD, UH, A PRO VIDEO GAMBLING STANCE WHEN THE SURVEY ITSELF STATED THAT WE ARE DEPENDENT ON GAMBLING REVENUE, WHICH WE ARE ABSOLUTELY NOT AT DEPENDENT ON GAMBLING REVENUE.

AND, UH, YET STILL, UH, DESPITE THAT PARTICULAR COMMENT BEING IN THE SURVEY, WE HAD OVER 70% OF THE RESPONDENTS INDICATE THAT, UM, WE SHOULD NOT BE ISSUING GAMBLING LICENSES JUST BECAUSE THAT IS THE ONLY WAY THE BUSINESS WOULD BE ABLE TO SUSTAIN ITSELF.

AND I WILL FURTHER ARGUE THAT THE MAJORITY OF THE RESPONDENTS INDICATED THAT THEY ARE UNCOMFORTABLE AT ESTABLISHMENTS THAT HAVE VIDEO GAMBLING.

AND SO AS A COUNCIL, THE QUESTION IS, IS THIS A POSITIVE MOVE FOR THE CITY TO HAVE THE PROLIFERATION OR EVEN THE SAME NUMBER OF GAMBLING ESTABLISHMENTS WHEN THE RESIDENTS OF OUR CITY DON'T FEEL COMFORTABLE IN THOSE ESTABLISHMENTS? SO IF, IF, YEAH, I, IM VERY SUPPORTIVE IF YOU WANNA INITIATE ANOTHER SURVEY, BUT I'M ALSO VERY COMFORTABLE THAT THIS IS A REPRESENTATIVE VOICE OF THE PEOPLE OF DECATUR REGARDING GAMBLING.

IF THERE ARE NO FINAL COMMENTS, WE WILL CALL THE QUESTION.

COUNCILMAN QL.

AYE.

COUNCILMAN COOPER? AYE.

COUNCILMAN MCDANIEL? AYE.

COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY AYE.

COUNCILMAN HORN? AYE.

MAYOR MOORE WOLF.

AYE.

SIX.

AYE.

NO NAYS.

ITEM NINE, ORDINANCE

[9.  Ordinance Amending City Code Chapter 56 Refuse and Recyclables Removal]

AMENDING CITY CODE CHAPTER 56, REFUSE AND RECYCLABLES REMOVAL.

MOTION OF THE ORDINANCE TO PASS AND BE ADOPTED.

SO MOVED.

SECOND, MR. WRIGHT, THIS IS A VERY BRIEF CHANGE AND ONE THAT, UH, WE WOULD LIKE TO ASK YOU TO APPROVE BECAUSE IT'S MORE TIMELY RIGHT NOW, UH, TO ALLOW BOTH THE OWNER OR THE OCCUPANT TO, UM, TO ARRANGE FOR GARBAGE SERVICE.

THIS, THIS, UM, IS SOMETHING WE WANTED TO FIX BEFORE A MORE COMPREHENSIVE OVERHAUL

[01:05:01]

OF THE GARBAGE ORDINANCE, WHICH WE'RE WORKING ON.

ANY QUESTIONS MR. ANIEL? I JUST WANNA MAKE IT CLEAR.

UH, THIS IS FOR COMMERCIAL BILL, UH, TENANTS? NO, THIS IS FOR RESIDENTIAL.

CHAPTER 56 DOES NOT ADDRESS COMMERCIAL ADDRESSES RESIDENTIAL FOR UNITS OF SIX AND LESS.

WELL I WANNA MAKE SURE, BECAUSE EVEN I WAS READING IT, NOT LOOKING AT THE CHAPTER THAT BECAUSE I KNOW A LOT OF COMMERCIAL, UH, RETAIL AND THAT HAVE ASKED ABOUT, YOU KNOW, RECYCLE AND THINGS LIKE THAT.

SO CHAPTER 56 DOESN'T REGULATE RESIDENTIAL AND INDUSTRIAL AT THE QUESTIONS.

MR. HORN.

UM, MR. WRIGHT, AND JUST TO CONFIRM, THIS IS THE SAME POLICY WE USE FOR, UH, WATER AND SEWER, IS THAT CORRECT? UH, IT'S SIMILAR IN THE SENSE THAT WE DO GIVE SOME, UH, PREROGATIVE TO THE, TO THE TENANT, BUT IT'S NOT IDENTICAL TO WATER AND SEWER BECAUSE, UM, WE ARE THE, THE, THE WATER PURVEYOR, WE ARE NOT THE PURVEYOR OF, OF THE GARBAGE SERVICE.

WE SIMPLY REGULATE IT.

LET ME REPHRASE THAT QUESTION THEN, BUT, UM, IN THIS CASE, IN WATER AND SEWER, BOTH THE TENANT AND THE PROPERTY OWNER CAN CHOOSE WHICH ONE IS GOING TO BE RESPONSIBLE IN THIS IS THE SAME SITUATION HERE, CORRECT? YEAH, RANDY.

IN WATER AND SEWER, THE OWNER IS THE CUSTOMER.

THEY CAN CHOOSE TO ALLOW THE TENANT TO BE, UM, NAMED IN THAT, BUT THE OWNER MUST IS ULTIMATELY ALWAYS THE CUSTOMER IN THIS SITUATION.

UM, WE AREN'T, AS THE CITY MANAGER SAID, UM, THE OPERATOR OF THE BUSINESS.

SO ALL THIS DOES IS ALLOW ONE OR THE OTHER TO, THEY STILL, WE STILL REQUIRE GARBAGE SERVICE AT THE ADDRESS AND IT JUST ALLOWS ONE OR THE OTHER, UM, TO BE THE, UH, ACCOUNT HOLDER.

AND IF THE TENANT DOESN'T PAY, WHO'S THE ULTIMATE RESPONSIBILITY FALL UNDER EITHER ONE.

AND THAT'S GONNA BE A CASE BY CASE DECISION ON INFORMATION THE CITY HAS AT THE TIME.

UM, IF WE HAVE A TENANT'S NAME, UM, IF WE HAPPEN TO HAVE A LEASE, UM, THAT SUGGESTS WHO'S RESPONSIBLE.

I MORE LIKELY THAN NOT, THE CITY WILL CONTINUE WHEN ASKED TO PURSUE A CASE TO GO AFTER THE OWNER, THEY'RE ULTIMATELY RESPONSIBLE.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? SCENE NONE.

COUNCILMAN KUHL? AYE.

COUNCILMAN COOPER? AYE.

COUNCILMAN MCDANIEL? AYE.

COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY AYE.

COUNCILMAN HORN? AYE.

MAYOR MOORE WOLF.

AYE.

SIX AYES NO NAYS.

ITEM 10

[10.  Resolution Accepting the State of Illinois Joint Purchasing Holder Bid Price of Morrow Brothers Ford Inc. for the Purchase of One (1) 2023 Ford F-450 Chassis]

RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE STATE OF ILLINOIS JOINT PURCHASING HOLDER BID PRICE OF MORROW BROTHERS FORD, INC.

FOR THE PURCHASE OF 1 20 23 FORD F FOUR 50 CHASSIS.

MOTION THE RESOLUTION TO PASS AND BE ADOPTED.

SO MOVED.

SECOND.

MR. WRIGHTON OR MR. MR. MR. NEWELL, UH, MAYOR MEMBERS OF COUNCIL, THIS IS, UH, USING THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, UH, BID FOR, UH, UH, 2022, UH, F F FOUR 50 CHASSIS, WHICH WE WILL THEN PUT A, UH, DUMP BED ON.

UH, AND THE RESOLUTION, IT SAID 2023.

IS THAT AN ERROR? ALTHOUGH MINE SAYS 1 20 23 FORD F FOUR 50 IS A 20 22 22.

ANY QUESTIONS FOR MR. NOELL? DOES THE RESOLUTION NEED TO BE REVISED? DIDN'T YOU WANNA BUY A 2022 MODEL BECAUSE THE THEY'RE HERE AND AVAILABLE AND READY FOR DELIVERY FASTER.

THAT WAS THE REASON THE, UH, PROPOSED TO 2022 IS THEY, THEY ACTUALLY HAVE THEM ON THE LOT.

THE OTHERS ARE NOT BUILT YET.

SO IT, UH, WAS, WE WOULD NOT GET A, UH, SO DO WE NEED TO AMEND THE, UM, ORDINANCE ON THE TABLE? NO.

IT LOOKS LIKE THE, UH, TITLE THAT WAS INPUT, UM, INTO THE AGENDA HAS THE 2023, BUT THE RESOLUTION DOES NOT.

SO DO WE NEED TO TAKE A DIFFERENT ACTION OR WE'RE GOOD? OKAY.

LEGAL SAYS WE'RE GOOD.

ANY QUESTIONS BEFORE I CALL THE QUESTION? SEE NONE.

COUNCILMAN KEEL? AYE.

COUNCILMAN COOPER? AYE.

COUNCILMAN MCDANIEL? AYE.

COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY AYE.

COUNCILMAN HORN? AYE.

MAYOR MOORE WOLF.

AYE.

SIX.

AYE, KNOWN AS ITEM 11 RESOLUTION,

[11.  Resolution Accepting the Bid and Authorizing the Execution of a Contract with Hoerr Construction, Inc. for 2023 Trenchless Long Lining Repairs Project, City Project 2023-28]

ACCEPTING THE BID AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A CONTRACT WITH HOER CONSTRUCTION, INC.

FOR 2023 TRENCHLESS LONG LINING REPAIRS PROJECT CITY PROJECT 2023 DASH 28.

MOTION THE RESOLUTION BE PASS AND BE ADOPTED.

SO MOVED.

SECOND, MR. NEWELL? UH, THIS IS A, A BID FOR TRENCHES LONG LINING, WHICH I THINK,

[01:10:01]

UH, HOPEFULLY YOU HAVE A GOOD GRASP ON ON WHAT THAT MEANS.

LOW BID WAS, UH, $886,000.

WE HAD FOUR, FOUR BIDDERS.

THEY WERE, THEY ALL CAME IN HIGHER THAN THE ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE, BUT THEY WERE GROUPED, UH, THREE OF THEM WERE GROUPED FAIRLY CLOSELY.

SO WE FEEL THAT THAT IS, UH, THAT IS A PRUDENT BID THAT WE SHOULD ACCEPT THAT WE WOULDN'T REALLY GET ANYTHING BETTER BY GOING OUT AGAIN.

ANY QUESTIONS FOR MR. NEWELL? I WILL ADD REAL QUICK.

I SHOULD HAVE MR. NEWELL, UH, THIS AFTERNOON I WAS GOING DOWN JASPER, YOU MIGHT WANNA CHECK WITH, UH, PUBLIC WORKS.

ONE OF YOUR MACHINES WAS BEING HAULED, UH, BY A, UH, TOW TRUCK DOWN TO YOUR FACILITY.

SO YOU MIGHT WANNA CHECK ON THAT.

MR. MCDANIEL, IS THAT PART OF THIS ITEM ON THE AGENDA? WELL, I, WELL, I WAS GONNA SAY NEW BUSINESS IS LATER IN THE MEETING.

YES, IT HAS TO DO WITH, WITH PUBLIC WORKS.

WELL, I FORGOT YOU'RE THE NEW GUY.

YOU'LL LEARN THE RULES AT SOME POINT.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? CALL THE QUESTION PLEASE.

COUNCILMAN KUHL.

ALL RIGHT.

COUNCILMAN COOPER.

AYE.

COUNCILMAN NATHANIEL? AYE.

COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY? AYE.

COUNCILMAN HORN? AYE.

MAYOR MORE WOLF? AYE.

SIX AYES KNOWN AS ITEM 12

[12.  Resolution Authorizing Execution of a Grant Agreement Between the State of Illinois, Illinois Environmental Protection Agency and the City of Decatur]

RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A GRANT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE STATE OF ILLINOIS IN ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AND THE CITY OF DECATUR.

MOTION FOR THE RESOLUTION TO PASS AND BE ADOPTED.

SO MOVED.

SECOND, MR. NEWELL.

THIS IS A, UH, THREE 19 GRANT THAT THE CITY WAS AWARDED IN 2021 AND, UH, UH, IS FOR WORK, UH, WITHIN THE WATERSHED, UH, REDUCING SEDIMENT.

AND I THINK THAT WAS OUTLINED THE, THE WORK THAT WAS, WAS OUTLINED IN THE MEMO.

ANY QUESTIONS FOR MR. NEWELL? DR.

HORN? MORE OF A COMMENT, BUT FIRST OF ALL, I JUST WANNA CONGRATULATE MR. NEWELL AND HIS TEAM ON SECURING THIS GRANT.

AND I WOULD JUST, UH, ENCOURAGE THE, UH, CITY STAFF TO CONTINUE TO FIND SUCH GRANTS IN READING THROUGH, UH, THIS PARTICULAR GRANT, UH, WE'RE GONNA REDUCE ABOUT 257 TONS OF SEDIMENT ANNUALLY.

AND, UM, ACCORDING TO A REPORT IN NORTHWATER CONSULTING FROM A FEW YEARS AGO, THERE'S ABOUT 160,000 TONS OF SEDIMENT THAT IS ENTERING THE LAKE EACH YEAR.

AND SO WE WILL BE REDUCING THE AMOUNT OF SEDIMENT 0.0016% AND AT SOME POINT IN TIME WE'RE GOING TO HAVE TO, UM, STEP UP OUR EFFORTS, UM, SO THAT WE BEGIN TO SEE REAL MEASURABLE CHANGES IN THE AMOUNT OF SEDIMENT.

ANY OTHER COMMENTS? SEEN? NONE.

COUNCILMAN KUEHL? AYE.

COUNCILMAN COOPER? AYE.

COUNCILMAN MCDANIEL? AYE.

COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY AYE.

COUNCILMAN HORN? AYE.

MAYOR MOORE WOLF.

AYE.

SIX AYES NO NAY.

ITEM 13

[13.  Resolution Authorizing Approval of Master Contract, Addendums to the Master Contract Between the State of Washington and Gillig, LLC with Additional State of Illinois Clauses Permitting the City of Decatur to Purchase E-Gen Flex Hybrid Buses]

RESOLUTION AUTHORIZED AND APPROVAL OF MASTER CONTRACT ADDENDUMS TO THE MASTER CONTRACT BETWEEN THE STATE OF WASHINGTON AND GILAG L L C WITH ADDITIONAL STATE OF ILLINOIS CLAUSES PERMITTING THE CITY OF DECATUR TO PURCHASE EGEN FLEX HYBRID BUSES MOTION FOR THE RESOLUTION TO PASS AND BE ADOPTED.

SO MOVED.

SECOND LACEY.

GOOD EVENING MAYOR COUNCIL.

UM, THIS IS TO PURCHASE FIVE EGEN FLEXES OFF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON CONTRACT WHEN WE'LL BE USING, UH, COMPETITIVE GRANT THAT WE WERE AWARDED IN 2022 FROM THE STATE OF ILLINOIS.

OUR REBUILD ROUND TWO FUNDS, AS WELL AS SOME F T A DOLLARS THAT WE GOT FROM THE LOW NO EMISSIONS GRANT.

SO I AM HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS, BUT TO JUST GIVE YOU A LITTLE BIT OF AN OVERVIEW, UM, WE DO CURRENTLY HAVE TWO HYBRIDS.

THOSE ARE THE TROLLEYS THAT WE RECEIVED.

THOSE ARE A 40 50 EP HYBRID.

SO THEY ARE 100% OF THE TIME A DIESEL HYBRID, SO THEY NEVER GO FULLY ELECTRIC.

THE EGEN FLEXES ARE THE NEWEST AND GREATEST IN THE HYBRIDS AND THEY RUN 50% OF THE TIME COMPLETELY ELECTRIC.

AND SO THEY DO THAT.

WE CAN GEO-FENCE AREAS AND SO, UM, USE STRATEGICALLY DOING IT AROUND HIGH VOLUME POPULATION AREAS LIKE OUR SHOPPING CENTERS, UM, DOWNTOWN.

AND IT WILL REDUCE OUR CO2 EMISSIONS AS WELL AS NOISE POLLUTION BECAUSE IF YOU'VE EVER BEEN AROUND THE IDLING BUSES, THE DIESELS ARE VERY LOUD.

WE ABSOLUTELY LOVE WATCHING THIS TRANSITION AND, AND ALL THE WORK YOU'RE DOING, YOU'RE DOING JUST GREAT, GREAT THINGS.

THANK YOU CHUCK.

UH, TWO QUESTIONS.

FIRST, ARE WE BUYING FOUR OR FIVE? SO, UM, WE CAN, WE'RE GONNA PURCHASE UP TO FIVE.

IT ALLOWS US TO REPLACE, WE HAVE FIVE OLDER BUSES THAT HAVE NOT BEEN REPLACED YET.

SO AFTER WE REPLACED THE LAST FIVE, UM, WE WILL HAVE A COMPARATIVELY NEW FLEET.

OKAY.

SECOND QUESTION IS, WE'RE RETROFITTING OUR TRANSIT BUILDING FOR ELECTRIC BUS CAPABILITY.

SO HOW DOES THIS FIT IN? BECAUSE THESE ARE HYBRIDS, CORRECT? CORRECT.

SO DOES THIS FIT INTO OUR MODEL? IT DOES.

IT, UM, FOLLOWS OUR ZERO EMISSION FLEET TRANSITION PLAN.

THE, THE RETROFITTING OF THE FACILITIES IS GOING

[01:15:01]

TO TAKE A FEW YEARS.

UM, THE FIVE BUSES THAT WE NEED TO REPLACE ARE COSTING AN INCREASING AMOUNT OF MONEY.

UM, EARLIER IN THE YEAR I HAD TO BRING A COMPLETE TRANSMISSION REBUILD TO YOU GUYS AND THAT WAS OVER $20,000.

UM, THESE BUSES WILL ALLOW US WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT AND EQUITY AMONG OUR MECHANICS.

UM, WHAT ALLISON HAS SAID AND GILLI IS THAT THE TECHNOLOGY WITH THESE EGEN FLEXES IS VERY SIMILAR TO THE ELECTRIC BUSES.

SO THIS WILL ALLOW, UM, STAFF TO GET A HANDLE ON HOW TO MAINTAIN THEM, HOW TO OPERATE THEM.

AND IT WILL BE A NICE KIND OF SEAMLESS TRANSITION AND STEPPING STONE INTO FULLY ELECTRIC.

OH, ONE MORE FOLLOW UP.

SO THEN THE NEXT BUSES WE BUY ARE ELECTRIC.

IS THAT WHAT WE'RE, WHAT WE'RE LOOKING AT OR? I, I THINK YES.

UM, I, THAT'S A FEW YEARS DOWN THE ROAD AND SO IT WOULD ALLOW US TO GET THE FACILITY UPDATED AND ALLOW FOR US TO HAVE THE CHARGING MODELS IN PLACE.

BUT FOR FLEET RESILIENCY, THIS IS A REALLY GOOD BRIDGE FOR US BECAUSE AS WE SAW WITH THE POWER STORM THAT HAPPENED, YOU KNOW, A LOT OF THE ELECTRICAL INFRASTRUCTURE WENT DOWN.

SO I THINK THAT WHEN WE LOOK FORWARD TOWARDS THE FUTURE, HAVING A MIXED FLEET OF THESE ELECTRIC HYBRIDS AND FULLY HYBRIDS IS GOING TO PROBABLY BE A VERY GOOD CHOICE FOR DECATUR.

MR. COOPER, UH, I'M GLAD WE'RE MOVING IN THAT DIRECTION, BUT JUST ONE QUICK QUESTION.

MM-HMM.

, UM, WITH THE TWO, UM, NEW TROLLEYS THAT WE GOT MM-HMM.

, WHAT HAS BEEN, WHAT HAS BEEN SO FAR? ANY ISSUES WITH ANY KIND MECHANICAL BREAKDOWNS WITH EITHER ONE OF THEM.

SO WE'VE HAD A FEW COMPUTER ISSUES WITH IT, BUT NOTHING THAT HAS PUT THEM OUT OF SERVICE FOR LONGER THAN 48 HOURS.

UM, AND THE MECHANICS HAVE DONE A REALLY GOOD JOB IN LEARNING HOW TO ADDRESS THOSE.

UM, EARLIER IN THE YEAR WE DID PURCHASE A, A HIGHER PACKAGE OF, UH, WHAT DO I WANNA CALL IT? TECHNOLOGY THAT READS THE CODES.

SORRY, .

ANY OTHER COMMENTS? THANK YOU LACEY.

CALL THE QUESTION PLEASE.

COUNCILMAN KEEL.

AYE.

COUNCILMAN COOPER? AYE.

COUNCILMAN MCDANIEL? AYE.

COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY? AYE.

COUNCILMAN HORN? AYE.

MAYOR MOORE WOLF.

AYE.

SIX.

AYE.

NO NAYS.

ITEM 14, RESOLUTION

[14.  Resolution Authorizing Execution and Agreement of FY2024 Transit Downstate Operating Grant Agreement with Illinois Department of Transportation]

AUTHORIZING EXECUTION AND AGREEMENT OF FY 2024 TRANSIT DOWNSTATE OPERATING GRANT AGREEMENT WITH THE ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MOTION.

THE RESOLUTION TO PASS AND BE ADOPTED.

SO MOVED.

SECOND SCOTT, IS THIS YOU OR LACEY? LACEY.

SO THIS IS OUR ANNUAL GRANT THAT WE GET FROM THE STATE OF ILLINOIS AND THIS IS WHAT FUNDS THE MAJORITY OF OUR OPERATIONS.

IT DOES REQUIRE A 35% MATCH, WHICH WE USE OUR, UH, FEDERAL DOLLARS FOR.

AND I'M HERE FOR ANY QUESTIONS? YOU MAY HAVE QUESTIONS.

SCENE NONE.

COUNCILMAN HL AYE.

COUNCILMAN COOPER? AYE.

COUNCILMAN MCDANIEL? AYE.

COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY? AYE.

COUNCILMAN HORN? AYE.

MAYOR MOORE WOLF.

AYE.

SIX AYES? NO.

NA.

DOES ANYONE ON

[15.  Consent Calendar: Items on the Consent Agenda/Calendar are matters requiring City Council approval or acceptance, but which are routine and recurring in nature, are not controversial, are matters of limited discretion, and about which little or no discussion is anticipated. However, staff’s assessment of what should be included on the Consent Agenda/Calendar can be in error. For this reason, any Consent Agenda/Calendar item can be removed from the Consent Agenda/Calendar by any member of the governing body, for any reason, without the need for concurrence by any other governing body member. Items removed from the Consent Agenda/Calendar will be discussed and voted on separately from the remainder of the Consent Agenda/Calendar.]

COUNSEL WISH TO REMOVE ANY ITEM FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA? DR.

HORN.

ITEM G.

ANY OTHERS? SO JUST ITEM G, THE FILING, RECEIVING AND FILING OF MINUTES OF BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS.

OKAY.

ITEM A, ORDINANCE ANNEXING TERRITORY 33 70 BURT DRIVE.

ITEM B, RESOLUTION TO APPROPRIATE MOTOR FUEL TAX FUNDS FOR LOCAL PUBLIC AGENCY GENERAL MAINTENANCE ITEM C.

RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SUPPLEMENT NUMBER ONE TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH ALFRED ISH AND COMPANY FOR THE COMPREHENSIVE OPERATIONS ANALYSIS PROJECT, CITY PROJECT D P T S 2022 DASH ZERO FIVE.

ITEM D.

RESOLUTION REGARDING TEMPORARY CLOSING OF STATE RIGHTS OF WAY COMMUNITY EVENTS SHORELINE CLASSIC ITEM E ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC LIQUOR IN CENTRAL PARK, DECATUR, DECATUR, AREA ARTS COUNCIL, ARTS AND CENTRAL PARK 2023 F ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC LIQUOR ON PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAY.

2200 BLOCK OF EAST HICKORY STREET BETWEEN NORTH 22ND STREET AND NORTH 23RD STREET, DECATUR LODGE 4 0 1 AT THE BENEVOLENT AND PROTECTIVE ORDER OF THE ELKS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

ITEM H RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ACTION REGARDING UNSAFE STRUCTURES AND ITEM I, RESOLUTION APPROVING APPOINTMENT.

CITY PLAN COMMISSION.

I NEED A MOTION TO APPROVE THE ITEMS AS PRESENTED.

SO MOVED.

SECOND.

COUNCILMAN KUHL? AYE.

COUNCILMAN COLT? COUNCILMAN COOPER? AYE.

COUNCILMAN MCDANIEL? AYE.

COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY AYE.

COUNCILMAN HORN? AYE.

MAYOR MOORE WOLF.

AYE.

SIX AYES, NO NAYS THEN WE HAVE

[G.  Receiving and Filing of Minutes of Boards and Commissions]

RECEIVING AND FILING OF MINUTES AND BOARDS AND, EXCUSE ME, RECEIVING AND FILING OF MINUTES OF BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS.

I NEED A MOTION TO APPROVE THE EYES AS PRESENTED.

SO MOVED.

SECOND DR.

HORN IN READING THE CITY PLAN COMMISSION MINUTES FROM JUNE 8TH, I'LL JUST NOTE TO MY COLLEAGUES THAT IT WAS A SEVEN

[01:20:01]

MINUTE MEETING WITH ALL MEMBERS PRESENT IN A UNANIMOUS VOTE THAT APPROVED A CHANGE THAT WOULD ALLOW A TATTOO AND BODY PIERCING PARLORS IN ZONING DISTRICT DISTRICTS WHERE PERSONAL SERVICE USES ARE ALLOWED, INCLUDING DOWNTOWN DECATUR.

SEVEN MINUTE MEETING, UNANIMOUS APPROVAL.

AND I WOULD SPECULATE THAT MY COLLEAGUES ON THE PLANNING, UH, COMMISSION, UM, WOULD NOTE THAT NOT ALLOWING TATTOO AND BODY PIERCING PARLORS IN ALL ZONING DISTRICTS WHERE OTHER PERSONAL SERVICES ARE ALLOWED IS A DISCRIMINATORY PRACTICE AND WE SHOULD BE WELCOMING OF, UM, PERSONAL SERVICE BUSINESSES IN ALL ZONES.

THIS ISSUE WAS TABLED A MONTH AGO BECAUSE INDIVIDUALS WANTED MORE INFORMATION ON THE COUNCIL.

WE'VE HAD A MONTH TO GET THAT INFORMATION, BUT AT THE END OF THE DAY, THIS IS A DISCRIMINATORY PRACTICE AND I MIGHT ADD THAT THERE'S A LOT OF PEOPLE THAT LIKE TO GET TATTOOS AND BODY PIERCINGS AS WELL.

AND SO IT MAY VERY WELL BE POPULAR.

MAYOR COUNSEL, THIS ITEM, UM, WILL BE ON THE AGENDA, UH, IN IN THE NEAR FUTURE.

UH, YOUR, YOUR ACTION TONIGHT IS SIMPLY TO, TO RATIFY THE, THE MINUTES OF THOSE BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS.

FURTHER COMMENT.

SCENE NONE.

COUNCILMAN KEEL.

AYE.

COUNCILMAN COOPER? AYE.

COUNCILMAN MCDANIEL? AYE.

COUNCILMAN GREGORY? AYE.

COUNCILMAN HORN? AYE.

MAYOR MOORE WOLF.

AYE.

SIX AYES, NO NAY.

AND MOVING ON TO OTHER

[VII.  Other Business]

BUSINESS.

UM, MR. MCDANIEL, ANY OTHER STREET REPORTS? TEASING, I I GET AROUND THE CITY.

I'M SORRY.

I FIND OUT WHAT'S GOING ON.

KEEP YOU GUYS INFORMED AND WE APPRECIATE IT.

MS. GREGORY? WELL, COUNCILMAN MCDANIEL, I'M GONNA HAVE A CONVERSATION WITH MATT NEWELL ABOUT A STREETLIGHT AFTER THE MEETING.

YOU COULD BRING IT UP NOW IF YOU'D LIKE.

LISA AT THE INTERSECTION COMING OUT OF ST.

MARY'S ONTO LAKE SHORE DRIVE.

THE STORM HAS TAKEN ONE OF THE LARGE SIGNAL LIGHTS, UM, AND MOVED IT.

SO IT'S DIFFICULT TO SEE WHETHER YOU HAVE A RED LIGHT, GREEN LIGHT OR AN ARROW AND PEOPLE RUN THAT LIGHT ALL THE TIME ANYWAY.

USUALLY IT'S A SEMI COMING RIGHT AT ME, SO IT'S, IT'S A GOOD TIME.

DIRECTION.

I, I KNOW, I KNOW PAT.

I DO WANNA THANK, UH, THE, OUR CITY STAFF, UH, OUR WORKERS GETTING AND, AND PICKING UP THE, THE ALL THE BRANCHES AND EVERYTHING IN THE BOULEVARD.

AND THE PUBLIC HAS BEEN REAL GOOD ABOUT GETTING 'EM OUT.

I MEAN, AGAIN, THE CITY HAS GONE THROUGH, YOU KNOW, UH, ICE STORMS AND THINGS LIKE THAT AND THIS, AND CITY STAFF ALWAYS STEPS FORWARD AND THEY DO A GOOD JOB.

I'D, I'D LIKE TO MENTION IF I CAN WITH REGARD TO THE COUNCILMAN MCDANIEL'S COMMENT, THAT WE ARE, UH, SLIGHTLY AHEAD OF SCHEDULE.

UM, WE EXPECT TO FINISH ALL OF THE ROUTES.

THE PUBLIC WORKS HAS ORGANIZED THIS BY SNOW REMOVAL ROUTE.

AND, UH, SO IF WE HAVEN'T GOTTEN TO YOUR AREA OF THE CITY, THEN WE SHOULD THIS WEEK.

AND I REALLY BELIEVE THAT THEY'RE GONNA WRAP THIS UP, UM, BY THE END OF THIS WEEK.

SO TWO WEEKS OF, OF OUR, OF OUR PUBLIC WORKS TEAM WORKING 12 HOUR SHIFTS TO GET THIS DONE.

UM, I WILL TELL YOU HOWEVER, AND MAYBE YOU HAVE OBSERVED THIS FOR YOURSELVES, THAT EVEN AFTER PUBLIC WORKS HAS GONE THROUGH A NEIGHBORHOOD, SOMETIMES THERE ARE PILES THAT ARE RE RE REAPPEARING AFTER THEY'RE ALREADY THROUGH.

SO I MEAN, OUR PLAN IS TO BRING THIS TO A CONCLUSION ON, ON THIS FRIDAY.

AND IF THERE'S STILL STUFF OUT THERE THAT WE'VE ALREADY BEEN THROUGH, UNLESS IT'S SOME REALLY LARGE A SPECIAL SITUATION, THEN THE, THEN THE OWNER'S GONNA NEED TO MAKE ALTERNATE ARRANGEMENTS FOR THE REMOVAL.

AND MATT, IF YOU WOULD PASS ALONG TO YOUR STAFF, THEY'VE DONE AN AMAZING JOB AND THE RESIDENTS ARE VERY, VERY THANKFUL FOR THE HELP BECAUSE THERE WERE A LOT OF TREES DOWN.

AND IS THIS A MOTION TO ADJOURN? PAT? GO AHEAD.

YOU WOULD LIKE THAT, BUT I DON'T HAVE TO WORK.

YOU GUYS HAVE TO, UM, WHAT CITY MANAGER, THE PEOPLE THAT PUT OUT THEIR UH, UH, LIMBS LATE, WELL, THEY BE NOTIFIED SOME WAY THEY, IT COULD BE THERE FOR THE, THE REST OF THE YEAR.

WELL WE, WE TOLD THEM TO, IF YOU'RE GONNA GET IT PICKED UP, YOU HAD TO HAVE IT OUT BY JULY 10TH.

AND, UM, AND SO WE DIDN'T START PICKING UP ANYWHERE IN THE CITY UNTIL JULY 10TH.

AND SO IF PEOPLE WERE STILL PUTTING IT OUT IN AREAS WHERE WE HADN'T PICKED UP YET, YOU KNOW, FINE.

BUT IF, BUT I THINK WHAT'S HAPPENED IS THERE'S SOME FOLKS THAT ARE PUTTING IT OUT EVEN AFTER JULY 10 IN AREAS THAT WE'VE ALREADY PICKED UP.

SO THAT'S WHY I NEEDED TO MENTION THAT IF WE HAVE SOME TIME, WE'RE GONNA GO BACK AND, AND DO SOME OTHER, UH, PICKUPS, UH, IF WE HAVE SOME TIME BEFORE FRIDAY.

BUT WE'RE NOT, WE'RE NOT TAKING THIS TO CITY PROPERTY.

WE'RE HAVING TO HIRE, YOU KNOW, SEPARATE MULCHING OF THIS STUFF.

AND SO THAT'S AN ARRANGEMENT THAT WE'RE GONNA BRING TO AN END.

IT'S NOT LIKE WE CAN JUST, WE'LL JUST JUST PUT IT ON THE PILE FOR, FOR BURNING LATER WITH THE OTHER, WHAT'S THE BIG DEAL? IT'S BECAUSE OF THE WAY WE, WE, WE, WE SET THIS UP SO WE'RE GONNA TRY TO GET AS MUCH AS WE CAN THIS WEEK,

[01:25:01]

BUT I JUST WANTED TO MENTION THAT THERE MAY BE SOME AREAS THAT WE'RE NOT ABLE TO GO BACK A SECOND TIME FOR EVERY, EVERY PART OF THE CITY WILL GET TOUCHED AT LEAST ONCE MR. COOPER.

UM, YOU KNOW, AGAIN, KUDOS TO THE CITY FOR THE WORK THEY'VE DONE WITH THE TREES.

I WAS GONNA INDICATE THAT.

THANKS PAT FOR BRINGING THAT UP.

UM, ALSO WANT TO THANK THOSE THAT WERE INVOLVED WITH THE, UM, THE GREAT, UM, UM, LAKE FEST CELEBRATION THAT WAS JUST FINISHED.

I THINK THAT WAS AN EXCELLENT, EXCELLENT WEEKEND.

UH, NOTHING BUT POSITIVE COMMENTS FROM OUR CITIZENS THAT I'VE RECEIVED REGARDING THE, THE LAKE FEST.

SO, UM, ON THAT AND UM, ALSO THE WORKS, WHOEVER PUT THE RE REPATCHING DOWN SOUTH MAIN AND, AND NORTH MAIN NORTH MAINE, I MEAN, AND, AND OTHER AREAS OF THE CITY THAT'S BEEN VERY WELL RECEPTIVE AS WELL.

AND HOPEFULLY THAT'LL CONTINUE WITH OTHER AREAS THAT WE NEED MAJOR PATCHING DONE.

THANK YOU TO ALL THOSE THAT ARE INVOLVED IN ALL THOSE.

AND HOW ABOUT A MOTION TO ADJOURN? SO MOVED.

SECOND.

COUNCILMAN KEEL.

AYE.

COUNCILMAN COOPER? AYE.

COUNCILMAN MCDANIEL? AYE.

COUNCILWOMAN GRY? AYE.

COUNCILMAN HORN? AYE MAYOR MORE WOLF? AYE.

SIX AYES, NO NAYS.

WE ARE ADJOURNED.